PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 2012Journal of Conflict Resolution228 citationsOpen Access

Shirts Today, Skins Tomorrow

KCKathleen Gallagher CunninghamKBKristin M. BakkeLSLee J. M. Seymour

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

While theoretical models of conflict often treat actors as unitary, most self-determination groups are fragmented into a number of competing internal factions. This article presents a framework for understanding the “dual contests” that self-determination groups engage in—the first with their host state and the second between co-ethnic factions within groups. Using a new data set of the number of factions within a sample of self-determination groups from 1960 to 2008, the authors find that competition between co-ethnic factions is a key determinant of their conflict behavior. More competing factions are associated with higher instances of violence against the state as well as more factional fighting and attacks on co-ethnic civilians. More factions using violence increases the chances that other factions will do so, and the entry of a new faction prompts violence from existing factions in a within-group contest for political relevance. These findings have implications for both theory and policy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cunningham et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a205e36232def661be73107https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002711429697
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper