PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 7, 2007Journal of Clinical Oncology575 citationsOpen Access

Lung Cancer in Elderly Patients: An Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database

View Full Paper
TOTaofeek K. OwonikokoCRCamille RaginCBChandra P. Belani

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the burden and outcome of lung cancer in the elderly, particularly for patients aged 80 years and older. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The national Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was analyzed for lung cancer outcomes during the period 1988 to 2003. A comparison was carried out between patients with lung cancer 80 years and older, 70 to 79 years, and younger than 70 years for demographics; stage distribution; 5-year relative survival; and survival based on histology, sex, race, stage, and treatment. The temporal trends in survival during the years 1988 to 1997 and 1998 to 2003 were also analyzed. RESULTS: Of 316,682 patients eligible for the analysis, 45,912 (14%) were 80 years or older (ie, very elderly); 103,963 (33%) were 70 to 79 years; and 166,807 (53%) were younger than 70 years. The distribution by stage and histology was comparable for all the three groups. Overall survival rate at 5 years was lower in the very elderly (7.4% v 12.3% v 15.5%; P /= 80 years, 70 to 79 years, and < 70 years, respectively). Overall outcomes for patients who underwent surgical therapy or radiation were comparable across the three age groups. In general, survival outcomes for the subgroup aged 70 to 79 years were similar to those of the subgroup aged 80 years and older who received single modality local therapy. CONCLUSION: Patients 80 years or older account for 14% (70 years or older accounted for 47%) of all lung cancers, are less likely to be subjected to surgery or radiation, and have inferior outcomes when compared with younger patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Owonikoko et al. (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a205e82e6386eb04298f8fdhttps://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2007.12.5435
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 165+ in the United States: 20052005 · 93 citations
  2. 2A phase I trial of carboplatin and etoposide for elderly (≥75 year-old) patients with small-cell lung cancer2006 · 10 citations
  3. 3Lung cancer rates convergence in young men and women in the United States: Analysis by birth cohort and histologic type2003 · 101 citations
  4. 4Advanced Age Is Not Correlated With Either Short-term or Long-term Postoperative Results in Lung Cancer Patients In Good Clinical Condition2005 · 65 citations
  5. 5Women's Susceptibility to Tobacco Carcinogens and Survival After Diagnosis of Lung Cancer2006 · 248 citations