PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 31, 2005Pediatric Blood & Cancer43 citations

Curing childhood acute myeloid leukemia (AML) at the half‐way point: Promises to keep and miles to go before we sleep

View Full Paper
WWWilliam G. Woods

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Childhood and adolescent acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is traditionally one of the hardest childhood cancers to successfully treat and had an overall survival well under 10% in the 1960s. Initial progress was made by three major events: (1) active chemotherapeutic agents were identified which led to remissions for the first time in this disease; (2) cooperative groups were instituted leading to important clinical trials; and (3) several single institutions began experimenting with the role of allogeneic matched sibling donor (MSD) BMT as effective intensification. Over the last 25 years, the cure rate has improved from <20% to 50% or higher. Most of the clinical research during this time of great advancement focused on two major themes: (1) the role of aggressive induction therapy in not only improving CR rates but in post-remission outcomes; and (2) the role of aggressive post-remission therapy in further improving survival, with an emphasis on high-dose Ara C-based chemotherapy, BMT, and supportive care. But we have "miles to go before we sleep." Some of the challenges that will lead to ongoing reduction of population-based mortality for AML through young adulthood include: (1) improving access of adolescents to pediatric AML therapy; (2) stratification by prognostic factors; (3) individualized therapy based on individual genetics and leukemia cell biology; (4) and the use of novel therapies including targeted immuno-conjugates and "small molecules" which disrupt abnormal signal transduction pathways. This brief review looks at both the advances over the last three decades as well as discusses the challenges moving forward for ultimately curing all children with this disease.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

William G. Woods (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a206437e5585532b8bb5db3https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.20646
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Increased survival in childhood acute nonlymphocytic leukemia after treatment with prednisone, cytosine arabinoside, 6‐thioguanine, cyclophosphamide, and oncovin (PATCO) combination chemotherapy1978 · 43 citations
  2. 2Should Adolescents With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Be Treated as Old Children or Young Adults? Comparison of the French FRALLE-93 and LALA-94 Trials2003 · 606 citations
  3. 3Outcomes in CCG-2961, a Children’s Cancer Group Phase III Trial for Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML).2005 · 6 citations
  4. 4Marrow transplantation for children in first remission of acute nonlymphoblastic leukemia: an update1985 · 77 citations
  5. 5The role of timing of high-dose cytosine arabinoside intensification and of maintenance therapy in the treatment of children with acute nonlymphocytic leukemia1990 · 57 citations