PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 25, 2019Frontiers in Communication155 citationsOpen Access

Why Science Communication, and Does It Work? A Taxonomy of Science Communication Aims and a Survey of the Empirical Evidence

KKKlemens KappelSHSebastian Jon Holmen

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In this paper, we offer a novel conceptual framework of the most important aims for science communication efforts found in the contemporary literature on science communication. We identify several distinct aims present in the literature such as generating public epistemic and moral trust, generating social acceptance, and enhancing democratic legitimacy, and we discuss some of the relations between the different aims. Finally, we examine whether and, if so, to what extent these different aims can be said to have been successfully reached in practice and find that the empirical literature regarding the evaluation of science communications efforts is scarce. We conclude by suggesting that science communicators be attentive to formulating their communicative aim(s) in more precise terms, as well as conduct systematic studies of the effectiveness of their communicative efforts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kappel et al. (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a207391fb035751fb31779chttps://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00055
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper