PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 15, 2021Open Medicine75 citationsOpen Access

Effect of gestational diabetes mellitus on lipid profile: A systematic review and meta-analysis

FRFatemeh Alsadat RahnemaeiRPReza PakzadAAAzam Amirian

Key Result

Gestational diabetes mellitus was associated with significantly higher triglyceride levels compared to normal pregnancy (SMD 1.14; 95% CI 0.91-1.38).

Study Design

Type

Meta-Analysis (n=23,792)

Structured PICO

Does gestational diabetes mellitus alter the lipid profile in pregnant women compared to normal pregnant women?

P
Population
23,792 pregnant women from 33 studies evaluating the association between gestational diabetes mellitus and lipid profiles.
E
Exposure
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)
C
Comparator
Normal pregnant women
O
Outcome
Lipid profile differences (Total cholesterol, triglycerides, VLDL, TG/HDL ratio, HDL, LDL)surrogate

Gestational diabetes mellitus is associated with an atherogenic lipid profile, particularly elevated triglycerides, which may serve as a reliable marker in its diagnosis.

Main Result

Standardized Mean Difference: 1.14 (95% CI 0.91–1.38)

Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) can have adverse effects on pregnancy. GDM is associated with changes in the lipid profile of pregnant women. Finding out the early ways to diagnose GDM can prevent the adverse outcomes. This meta-analysis study aimed to determine the effect of GDM on lipid profile. PubMed, ProQuest, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrial were systematically searched for published articles relating to GDM until 2021 according to PRISMA guidelines. Newcastle Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of the studies. Thirty-three studies with a sample size of 23,792 met the criteria for entering the meta-analysis. Pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) for total cholesterol (TC) and triglyceride (TG) was 0.23 mg/dL (95% CI: 0.11-0.34) and 1.14 mg/dL (95% CI: 0.91-1.38), respectively. The mean of TC and TG in people with GDM was higher than that in normal pregnant women. A similar pattern was observed for the very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and TG/high-density lipoprotein (HDL) ratio, with pooled SMD of 0.99 mg (95% CI: 0.71-1.27) and 0.65 mg (95% CI: 0.36-0.94), respectively. Pooled SMD for HDL was -0.35 mg/dL (95% CI: -0.54 to -0.16), women with GDM had a mean HDL lower than normal pregnant women. Although pooled SMD was higher for low-density lipoprotein (LDL) in the GDM group, this difference was not significant (0.14 95% CI: -0.04 to 0.32). Of all the lipid profiles, the largest difference between the GDM and control groups was observed in TG (SMD: 1.14). Elevated serum TG had the strongest effect on GDM. Higher levels of TC, LDL, VLDL, and TG/HDL ratio, and lower level of HDL were exhibited in GDM group. So, these markers can be considered as a reliable marker in the diagnosis of GDM.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rahnemaei et al. (2021) conducted a meta-analysis in Gestational diabetes mellitus (n=23,792). Gestational diabetes mellitus vs. Normal pregnant women was evaluated on Triglyceride (TG) levels (SMD 1.14, 95% CI 0.91-1.38). Gestational diabetes mellitus was associated with significantly higher triglyceride levels compared to normal pregnancy (SMD 1.14; 95% CI 0.91-1.38).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a207394c7fd8e96e4f5fafbhttps://doi.org/10.1515/med-2021-0408
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper