PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 4, 2024Scientific Reports10 citationsOpen Access

Validation and user experience of a dry electrode based Health Patch for heart rate and respiration rate monitoring

JWJonathan C J WeiTBTim J. van den BroekJBJan Ubbo van Baardewijk

Key Result

The dry electrode-based Health Patch demonstrated high agreement with reference devices for heart rate monitoring (Lin's concordance coefficient 0.98) but marginal agreement for respiratory rate (0.56).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=25)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does a dry electrode-based Health Patch accurately measure heart rate, heart rate variability, and respiration rate compared to reference devices in healthy adults?

P
Population
25 healthy adult volunteers with a military background underwent a 30-minute exercise protocol to validate a dry electrode-based Health Patch for vital sign monitoring.
I
Intervention
Health Patch research platform with self-adhesive dry electrodes measuring ECG and 4-lead bioimpedance, worn on the left side of the chest during a 30-minute exercise protocol (rest, squats, slow cycling, fast cycling).
C
Comparator
Simultaneous measurement with reference devices: Shimmer3 ECG Unit (for heart rate and heart rate variability) and Cosmed K5 (for respiration rate).
O
Outcome
Analytical validation for heart rate, heart rate variability, and respiration rate (measured via Lin's concordance correlation coefficient, Mean Absolute Error, and Bland-Altman analysis).surrogate

The dry-electrode Health Patch provides highly accurate heart rate and heart rate variability monitoring, though respiratory rate accuracy is marginal during exercise due to motion artifacts.

Main Result

Effect estimate: CCC 0.98 (95% CI 0.98-0.98)

Limitations

  • Recruited volunteers all had a military background and may differ from the average population.
  • Study duration was relatively short (less than one hour) with relatively low maximum heart rate activities.
  • Suboptimal position of the patch under the armpit for bioimpedance-based respiratory monitoring.
  • Reference equipment for respiratory rate (Cosmed) only provided averaged data updated every 3-5 minutes, making direct comparison difficult
  • Motion artifacts and tissue conductivity changes during exercise impacted bioimpedance measurements for respiratory rate
  • Short exercise protocol duration

Abstract

Successful implementation of remote monitoring of vital signs outside of the hospital setting hinges on addressing three crucial unmet needs: longer-term wear, skin comfort and signal quality. Earlier, we developed a Health Patch research platform that uses self-adhesive dry electrodes to measure vital digital biomarkers. Here, we report on the analytical validation for heart rate, heart rate variability and respiration rate. Study design included n = 25 adult participants with data acquisition during a 30-minute exercise protocol involving rest, squats, slow, and fast cycling. The Shimmer3 ECG Unit and Cosmed K5, were reference devices. Data analysis showed good agreement in heart rate and marginal agreement in respiratory rate, with lower agreement towards higher respiratory rates. The Lin's concordance coefficient was 0.98 for heart rate and 0.56 for respiratory rate. Heart rate variability (RMSSD) had a coefficient of 0.85. Participants generally expressed a positive experience with the technology, with some minor irritation from the medical adhesive. The results highlighted potential of this technology for short-to-medium term clinical use for cardiorespiratory health, due to its reliability, accuracy, and compact design. Such technology could become instrumental for remote monitoring providing healthcare professionals with continuous data, remote assessment and enhancing patient outcomes in cardiorespiratory health management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wei et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Healthy adults (n=25). Health Patch (dry electrode based) vs. Reference devices (Shimmer3 ECG Unit and Cosmed K5) was evaluated on Heart rate measurement agreement (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient) (CCC 0.98, 95% CI 0.98-0.98). The dry electrode-based Health Patch demonstrated high agreement with reference devices for heart rate monitoring (Lin's concordance coefficient 0.98) but marginal agreement for respiratory rate (0.56).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20783e04d2adee4bf4900bhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-73557-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Validation of Wearable Device Consisting of a Smart Shirt with Built-In Bioelectrodes and a Wireless Transmitter for Heart Rate Monitoring in Light to Moderate Physical Work2022 · 22 citations
  2. 2Clinical validation of a contactless respiration rate monitor2023 · 35 citations
  3. 3A Concordance Correlation Coefficient to Evaluate Reproducibility1989 · 8,872 citations
  4. 4Signal Quality Analysis for Long-Term ECG Monitoring Using a Health Patch in Cardiac Patients2023 · 32 citations
  5. 5An Overview of Heart Rate Variability Metrics and Norms2017 · 7,154 citations