PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 30, 2013Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism53 citationsOpen Access

Ultrasonographic Markers of Vascular Risk in Patients with Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis

MSMauro SilvestriniCAClaudia AltamuraRCRaffaella Cerqua

Key Result

Stenosis progression was a strong risk factor for ipsilateral stroke (HR 4.32) in asymptomatic subjects with severe internal carotid artery stenosis, alongside stenosis severity and IMT.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=621)

Structured PICO

Do ultrasonographic markers (IMT, stenosis progression, and severity) predict cerebrovascular events in patients with asymptomatic severe ICA stenosis?

P
Population
621 subjects with unilateral asymptomatic severe internal carotid artery stenosis, followed for a median of 27 months.
E
Exposure
Ultrasonographic evaluation of vascular risk profile, plaque characteristic, stenosis progression, and common carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT)
O
Outcome
Occurrence of ischemic stroke ipsilateral to ICA stenosis and vascular deathhard clinical

Ultrasonographic markers such as IMT, stenosis progression, and severity are significant independent predictors of ipsilateral stroke in patients with asymptomatic severe ICA stenosis.

Main Result

Hazard Ratio: 4.32

Abstract

Six-hundred twenty-one subjects with unilateral asymptomatic severe internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis were prospectively evaluated with a median follow-up of 27 months (min=6, max=68). Vascular risk profile, plaque characteristic, stenosis progression, and common carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) were investigated in all patients. Outcome measures were occurrence of ischemic stroke ipsilateral to ICA stenosis and vascular death, while myocardial infarction, contralateral strokes, and transient ischemic attack were considered as competing events. A total of 99 subjects (15.9%) suffered from a vascular event. Among them, 39 were strokes ipsilateral to the stenosis (6.3%). Degree of stenosis, stenosis progression, and common carotid artery IMT resulted as independent predictive factors of ipsilateral stroke. Considering a stenosis of 60% to 70% as reference, a degree between 71% and 90% increased the risk by 2.45, while a degree between 91% and 99% increased the risk by 3.26. The progression of stenosis was a strong risk factor (hazard ratio=4.32). Finally, the role of carotid IMT was confirmed as crucial additional measure, with an increased risk by 25% for each 0.1 mm IMT increase. Our data suggest that IMT, stenosis progression and severity should be considered as risk factors for cerebrovascular events in asymptomatic subjects with severe ICA stenosis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Silvestrini et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Unilateral asymptomatic severe internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis (n=621). Stenosis progression vs. No progression / lower stenosis severity was evaluated on Ischemic stroke ipsilateral to ICA stenosis and vascular death (HR 4.32). Stenosis progression was a strong risk factor for ipsilateral stroke (HR 4.32) in asymptomatic subjects with severe internal carotid artery stenosis, alongside stenosis severity and IMT.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a207b45a40bcbc79e09a0e6https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2013.5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Beneficial Effect of Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic Patients with High-Grade Carotid Stenosis1991 · 8,502 citations
  2. 2What Is the Current Status of Invasive Treatment of Extracranial Carotid Artery Disease?2011 · 63 citations
  3. 3Prevention2004 · 62 citations
  4. 4Carotid intima-media thickness and cardiovascular events.2011 · 176 citations
  5. 5Definition and Evaluation of Transient Ischemic Attack2009 · 1,848 citations