PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1999Cancer184 citationsOpen Access

Immunohistochemistry with pancytokeratins improves the sensitivity of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast carcinoma

View Full Paper
BCBrian J. CzernieckiASAlice M. ScheffLCLinda S. Callans

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is being investigated as a staging procedure for breast carcinoma. The authors evaluated whether immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis improves the sensitivity of this procedure. METHODS: Forty-four women with breast carcinoma were recruited for SLN biopsy. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was followed by intraoperative localization using a handheld gamma probe and blue dye. After SLN identification, an immediate complete axillary lymph node dissection was performed in all patients. All lymph nodes were subjected to routine histology (hematoxylin and eosin H&E) and IHC using antibody to cytokeratins. RESULTS: The SLN was identified in 41 of 43 patients (95%). Successful SLN identification was independent of biopsy technique (open surgical 95% vs. fine-needle aspiration/core needle biopsy 96%). Twelve of 41 patients (29%) had evidence of lymph node metastasis in the SLN by routine histology. Of the twenty-nine patients with H&E negative SLN, 3 were found to have metastasis by IHC for a conversion rate of 10%. Fifteen of 41 patients (37%) had evidence of metastasis in SLN. All 26 patients with H&E and IHC negative SLN had negative nonsentinel lymph nodes by routine histology and IHC (100% negative predictive value). All patients with tumors 2 cm or patients with macrometastasis to the SLN (P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm that SLN biopsy is extremely accurate for patients with breast carcinoma, even after open surgical biopsy. IHC analysis or serial sectioning of SLN improves the sensitivity of this staging technique.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Czerniecki et al. (1999) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a207e6215df8032213e8879https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19990301)85:5<1098::aid-cncr13>3.0.co;2-n
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The use of monoclonal antibodies for the histopathological detection of mammary axillary micrometastases.1987 · 48 citations
  2. 2Technical Details of Intraoperative Lymphatic Mapping for Early Stage Melanoma1992 · 4,423 citations
  3. 3Herbal remedies—an alternative1990 · 37 citations
  4. 4Detection and significance of occult axillary node metastases in patients with invasive breast cancer1978 · 266 citations
  5. 5Findings from NSABP protocol no. b-04: Comparison of radical mastectomy with alternative treatments. II. The clinical and biologic significance of medial-central breast cancers1981 · 156 citations