PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2018Educational and Psychological Measurement67 citationsOpen Access

From a Sampling Precision Perspective, Skewness Is a Friend and Not an Enemy!

DTDavid TrafimowTWTonghui WangCWCong Wang

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

advocated that researchers consider using the a priori procedure. According to this procedure, the researcher specifies, prior to data collection, how close she wishes her sample mean(s) to be to the corresponding population mean(s), and the desired probability of being that close. A priori equations provide the necessary sample size to meet specifications under the normal distribution. Or, if sample size is taken as given, a priori equations provide the precision with which estimates of distribution means can be made. However, there is currently no way to perform these calculations under the more general family of skew-normal distributions. The present research provides the necessary equations. In addition, we show how skewness can increase the precision with which locations of distributions can be estimated. This conclusion, based on the perspective of improving sampling precision, contrasts with a typical argument in favor of performing transformations to normalize skewed data for the sake of performing more efficient significance tests.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Trafimow et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2084bf7b2df09761f89a6ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/0013164418764801
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper