PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 23, 2004British journal of surgery137 citationsOpen Access

POSSUM and P-POSSUM for risk-adjusted audit of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy

View Full Paper
RMR. S. MohilDBDivya BhatnagarLBLeila Bahadur

Structured PICO

Are POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring systems valid predictors of 30-day mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy?

P
Population
120 patients undergoing emergency laparotomy in a single unit of a referral hospital in a developing country
I
Intervention
POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring systems (using linear regression and exponential methods of analysis)
C
Comparator
Actual observed outcomes
O
Outcome
30-day mortality and morbidity rateshard clinical

POSSUM and P-POSSUM, when analyzed using exponential methods, are accurate predictors of morbidity and mortality for risk-adjusted audit in emergency laparotomy.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) is a scoring system that is used widely to predict 30-day mortality and morbidity rates. The Portsmouth predictor modification (P-POSSUM) was developed to overcome the overprediction of mortality by POSSUM, especially in low-risk patients. In this prospective study, the validity of POSSUM and P-POSSUM was tested in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy in a referral hospital of a developing country. METHODS: Some 120 patients who underwent emergency laparotomy in a single unit were studied. Predicted morbidity and mortality rates were calculated by POSSUM and P-POSSUM equations using both linear regression and the exponential methods of analysis. These were compared with actual outcomes. RESULTS: When the linear method of analysis was used POSSUM overpredicted morbidity, and there was a significant difference between the observed and predicted values (observed to expected (O : E) ratio 0.68). The prediction was more accurate when the exponential method was used (O : E ratio 0.91). POSSUM also significantly overpredicted mortality when analysed by the linear method (O : E ratio 0.39), but the prediction improved when exponential analysis was used (O : E ratio 0.62). Applying linear and exponential analyses for P-POSSUM, the O : E ratios for mortality were 0.66 and 0.88 respectively. CONCLUSION: If analysed correctly POSSUM is a good predictor of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. P-POSSUM predicts mortality equally well. Both equations may be used for risk-adjusted surgical audit of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mohil et al. (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a209db16236d09b9bcd3009https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4465
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Can POSSUM, a scoring system for perioperative surgical risk, predict postoperative clinical course?1998 · 19 citations
  2. 2Evaluation of the POSSUM Scoring System in Lung Surgery1998 · 35 citations
  3. 3Operative mortality rates among surgeons2000 · 113 citations
  4. 4POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality1998 · 809 citations
  5. 5Comparison of individual surgeon's performance1996 · 97 citations