PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1982The Journal of Physiology146 citationsOpen Access

The ionic basis of concentration‐related effects of noradrenaline on the action potential of calf cardiac purkinje fibres.

View Full Paper
RKRobert S. KassSWSanne E. Wiegers

Structured PICO

Does noradrenaline alter the action potential and ionic currents in calf cardiac Purkinje fibres?

P
Population
Calf cardiac Purkinje fibres
I
Intervention
Noradrenaline at varying concentrations
O
Outcome
Action potential duration and ionic currents (Isi, Ix)surrogate

Noradrenaline exerts paradoxical concentration-dependent effects on the Purkinje fibre action potential, driven by differential responsiveness of ionic currents.

Abstract

Noradrenaline has paradoxical concentration-dependent effects on the Purkinje fibre action potential. At concentrations greater than 500 nM, it shortens the action potential whereas at lower concentrations it prolongs the action potential. 2. We determined the dose--response relation for Isi to noradrenaline in Purkinje fibres and found that a noradrenaline concentration of 126 nM produces a half maximal effect. 3. A maintained component of Isi was shown to have a similar response to noradrenaline. 4. The dose-dependence of noradrenaline-induced changes in Ix was determined. The half maximal noradrenaline concentration for this relationship was shown to be 133 nM. 5. The dose--response relationships for Ix and Isi were not altered by variation in extracellular Ca2+. 6. Ix appears to be approximately twice as responsive as Isi to saturating doses of noradrenaline. 7. These data were incorporated in a computer-generated reconstruction of the effects of noradrenaline on the action potential and are sufficient to account for the paradoxical effects of noradrenaline.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kass et al. (1982) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a209e9e239b4646016d8de9https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014054
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper