PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 2022Bone & Joint Open67 citationsOpen Access

Environmental sustainability in orthopaedic surgery

View Full Paper
KPKar May PhoonIAIrrum AfzalDSDavid H. Sochart

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

AIMS: In the UK, the NHS generates an estimated 25 megatonnes of carbon dioxide equivalents (4% to 5% of the nation's total carbon emissions) and produces over 500,000 tonnes of waste annually. There is limited evidence demonstrating the principles of sustainability and its benefits within orthopaedic surgery. The primary aim of this study was to analyze the environmental impact of orthopaedic surgery and the environmentally sustainable initiatives undertaken to address this. The secondary aim of this study was to describe the barriers to making sustainable changes within orthopaedic surgery. METHODS: A literature search was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines through EMBASE, Medline, and PubMed libraries using two domains of terms: "orthopaedic surgery" and "environmental sustainability". RESULTS: A total of 13 studies were included in the final analysis. All papers studied the environmental impact of orthopaedic surgery in one of three areas: waste management, resource consumption, and carbon emissions. Waste segregation was a prevalent issue and described by nine studies, with up to 74.4% of hazardous waste being generated. Of this, six studies reported recycling waste and up to 43.9% of waste per procedure was recyclable. Large joint arthroplasties generated the highest amount of recyclable waste per procedure. Three studies investigated carbon emissions from intraoperative consumables, sterilization methods, and through the use of telemedicine. One study investigated water wastage and demonstrated that simple changes to practice can reduce water consumption by up to 63%. The two most common barriers to implementing environmentally sustainable changes identified across the studies was a lack of appropriate infrastructure and lack of education and training. CONCLUSION: 2022;3(8):628-640.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Phoon et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20aafcf778797513eb8326https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.38.bjo-2022-0067.r1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The use of Lean and Six Sigma methodologies in surgery: A systematic review2014 · 279 citations
  2. 2Efficacy of handrubbing with alcohol based solution versus standard handwashing with antiseptic soap: randomised clinical trial2002 · 358 citations
  3. 3Reducing Medical Waste2010 · 163 citations
  4. 4The impact of surgery on global climate: a carbon footprinting study of operating theatres in three health systems2017 · 807 citations
  5. 5Rapid implementation of virtual clinics due to COVID-19: report and early evaluation of a quality improvement initiative2020 · 262 citations