PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 14, 20202 citationsOpen Access

Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 variants with INSaFLU and galaxyproject

YUYasemin UtkueriEFEvrim FerEBElif Bozlak

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Development of workflows for NGS data analysis have facilitated the study of sequences. Such workflows have their own advantages and challenges based on the algorithms they use. As a part of this study for Biohackathon 2020, we have compared the SARS-CoV-2 variant outputs of INSaFLU workflow with those analyzed by galaxyproject/SARS-CoV-2. Within 24 samples, 597 variants were found to be shared between two workflows, with almost half of them found within the coding sequence of replicase polyprotein 1ab. Within the shared variants, number of non-synonymous variants were considerably higher and nearly half of the variants were multiallelic. Prospective studies could help us evaluate the accuracy of these variants.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Utkueri et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20ac2cbb1709e7fde5182chttps://doi.org/10.37044/osf.io/9d3cz
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1LoFreq: a sequence-quality aware, ultra-sensitive variant caller for uncovering cell-population heterogeneity from high-throughput sequencing datasets2012 · 1,557 citations
  2. 2Nextstrain: real-time tracking of pathogen evolution2018 · 3,499 citations
  3. 3The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines2020 · 4,332 citations
  4. 4A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China2020 · 12,973 citations
  5. 5Computer-aided drug design of broad-spectrum antiviral compounds2017 · 1 citations