PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 2, 2017Journal of Clinical Oncology123 citations

Modernizing Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria: Recommendations of the American Society of Clinical Oncology–Friends of Cancer Research Brain Metastases Working Group

View Full Paper
NLNancy U. LinTPTatiana M. ProwellATAntoinette R. Tan

Key Points

  • The aim is to broaden trial eligibility criteria to enhance patient access and reflect intended treatment populations for brain metastases.
  • Conducted a multistakeholder workshop in 2016 after a literature search and teleconferences.
  • Developed consensus recommendations for including patients with brain metastases, addressing minimum age and organ dysfunction.
  • Refined guidelines based on workshop input regarding inclusion criteria for treated/stable, active brain metastases, and leptomeningeal disease.
  • Identified key populations: treated/stable brain metastases, active brain metastases, and leptomeningeal disease.
  • Encouraged inclusion of patients with treated/stable brain metastases in clinical trials under most conditions.
  • Recommended a separate cohort for patients with leptomeningeal disease when CNS activity is expected.

Abstract

Purpose Broadening trial eligibility to improve accrual and access and to better reflect intended-to-treat populations has been recognized as a priority. Historically, patients with brain metastases have been understudied, because of restrictive eligibility across all phases of clinical trials. Methods In 2016, after a literature search and series of teleconferences, a multistakeholder workshop was convened. Our working group focused on developing consensus recommendations regarding the inclusion of patients with brain metastases in clinical trials, as part of a broader effort that encompassed minimum age, HIV status, and organ dysfunction. The working group attempted to balance the needs of protecting patient safety, facilitating access to investigational therapies, and ensuring trial integrity. On the basis of input at the workshop, guidelines were further refined and finalized. Results The working group identified three key populations: those with treated/stable brain metastases, defined as patients who have received prior therapy for their brain metastases and whose CNS disease is radiographically stable at study entry; those with active brain metastases, defined as new and/or progressive brain metastases at the time of study entry; and those with leptomeningeal disease. In most circumstances, the working group encourages the inclusion of patients with treated/stable brain metastases in clinical trials. A framework of key considerations for patients with active brain metastases was developed. For patients with leptomeningeal disease, inclusion of a separate cohort in both early-phase and later-phase trials is recommended, if CNS activity is anticipated and when relevant to the specific disease type. Conclusion Expanding eligibility to be more inclusive of patients with brain metastasis is justified in many cases and may speed the development of effective therapies in this area of high clinical need.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lin et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20b4ae52a81c8a3de5238bhttps://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2017.74.0761
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Combination inhibition of PI3K and mTORC1 yields durable remissions in mice bearing orthotopic patient-derived xenografts of HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases2016 · 133 citations
  2. 2Reporting results of cancer treatment1981 · 7,885 citations
  3. 3The development and psychometric validation of a brain cancer quality-of-life questionnaire for use in combination with general cancer-specific questionnaires1996 · 343 citations
  4. 4Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium (TBCRC) 022: A Phase II Trial of Neratinib for Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases2016 · 171 citations
  5. 5Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) versus lapatinib plus capecitabine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer and central nervous system metastases: a retrospective, exploratory analysis in EMILIA2014 · 404 citations