PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 6, 2024Cognition & Emotion11 citationsOpen Access

Emojis and affective priming in visual word recognition

View Full Paper
DSDemian StoianovNKNenagh KempSWSigny Wegener

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Emojis are frequently used in digital communication to supplement the lack of non-verbal cues, but their integration during reading has not been thoroughly examined. This study explores the interplay between language and emotion by testing the influence of emotional valence and face-status of emojis on visual word recognition. Two online experiments were conducted with 92 native English-speaking university students, examining priming effects between congruent (e.g. Formula: see text delicious) and incongruent (e.g. Formula: see text hate) prime-target pairs, varying the face-status of the emoji prime (face vs. non-face) and the valence (positive vs. negative) of the word target. Irrespective of valence, face emojis demonstrated a processing advantage over non-face emojis, implying automatic attention capture. Additionally, the results revealed an interaction between prime-target congruency and valence, with a facilitatory effect for positive, but not negative, items, suggesting a valence-specific mechanism of affective priming in the lexical decision task. The research suggests that the rapid integration of emoji content occurs during the early stages of visual word recognition, with heightened attentional sensitivity to both face-like and positive stimuli when reading digital communications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stoianov et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20b64e52a81c8a3de524b0https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2024.2402492
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items2008 · 8,707 citations
  2. 2The distributed human neural system for face perception2000 · 4,997 citations
  3. 3Detecting outliers: Do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median2013 · 4,215 citations
  4. 4Not all emotions are created equal: The negativity bias in social-emotional development.2008 · 1,194 citations
  5. 5mediation : R Package for Causal Mediation Analysis2014 · 4,093 citations