PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 26, 2008Heart234 citations

Risk factors and time delay associated with cardiac device infections: Leiden device registry

View Full Paper
JLJaco C LekkerkerkerCNCees van NieuwkoopSTSerge A. Trines

Key Result

Device revision (OR 3.67; 95% CI 1.51-8.96), renal dysfunction (OR 4.64), and oral anticoagulation (OR 2.83) were identified as independent risk factors for cardiac device infections.

Study Design

Type

Case-Control (n=150)

Structured PICO

What are the risk factors and time delays associated with cardiac device infections?

P
Population
150 patients (75 with cardiac device infections and 75 matched controls) from a registry of 3,410 device procedures performed between 2000 and 2007.
E
Exposure
Presence of risk factors including device revision, renal dysfunction (eGFR <60 ml/min), and oral anticoagulation use
C
Comparator
Matched controls without cardiac device infections
O
Outcome
Time course, risk factors, culture results and frequency of cardiac device infectionssafety

Cardiac device infections occur in 2.2% of procedures, with significant risk factors including device revision, renal dysfunction, and oral anticoagulation, and a substantial proportion occurring more than two years post-procedure.

Main Result

Odds Ratio: 3.67 (95% CI 1.51–8.96)

Abstract

AIMS: A nested case-control study of 75 patients with cardiac device infections (CDI) and 75 matched controls was conducted to evaluate time course, risk factors, culture results and frequency of CDI. METHODS AND RESULTS: CDI occurred in 75/3410 (2.2%) device implantation and revision procedures, performed between 2000 and 2007. The time delay between device procedure and infection ranged from 0 to 64 months (mean 14 (SD 16)), 21 patients (28%) had an early infection (12 months). Of interest, 18 (24%) patients presented with an infection >24 months after the device-related procedure. Time delay until infection was significantly shorter when cultures were positive for micro-organisms compared to negative cultures (8 (12) vs 18 (18) months, p = 0.03). Pocket cultures in delayed infections remained more often negative (61% vs 23%, p = 0.01). Independent CDI risk factors were: device revision (odds ratio (OR) 3.67; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.51 to 8.96), renal dysfunction defined as glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min (OR 4.64; CI, 1.48 to 14.62) and oral anticoagulation use (OR 2.83; CI 1.20 to 6.68). CONCLUSION: CDI occurred in 2.2% of device procedures, with 24% occurring more than two years after the device-related procedure. Renal dysfunction, device revisions and oral anticoagulation are potent risk factors for CDI.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lekkerkerker et al. (2008) conducted a case-control in Cardiac device infections (n=150). Device revision vs. Primary implantation (no revision) was evaluated on Cardiac device infection (OR 3.67, 95% CI 1.51-8.96). Device revision (OR 3.67; 95% CI 1.51-8.96), renal dysfunction (OR 4.64), and oral anticoagulation (OR 2.83) were identified as independent risk factors for cardiac device infections.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20baae2a5ebb5b653978b9https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2008.151985
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper