PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 25, 2025Agricultural Water Management3 citationsOpen Access

Accounting for biomass water equivalent variations in soil moisture retrievals from cosmic ray neutron sensor

View Full Paper
SASamer K. AlmashharawiSSSusan Steele‐DunneMHMohammad El Hajj

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Cosmic ray neutron sensor (CRNS) has gained popularity in the last decade for its suitability in estimating area-averaged soil moisture (SM). The presence of fresh biomass influences the CRNS signal due to its water content, introducing bias to soil moisture estimation. Calibration and correction methods have been developed to account for this bias, but they usually require laborious sampling. Here, a novel approach is tested to assess the impact of biomass water equivalent (BWE) on CRNS soil moisture estimation. It was conducted in two contrasting environments from 15/11/21–1/02/23 for an olive orchard in Saudi Arabia, and from 15/02/22–30/03/23 for a cherry orchard in France. Water-uptake rates were monitored using sap flow sensors, as well as actual evapotranspiration (AET) and in-situ SM within the CRNS footprint. Concurrent environmental variables were also measured with a research-grade weather stations. It was found that when vapor pressure deficit (VPD) > 1.8kPa, CRNS-derived SM (CRNS-SM) closely matched in-situ SM measurements, which indicates minimal influence from BWE. Conversely, when VPD is lower than 1.8kPa, CRNS-SM overestimates the in-situ moisture. An optimization approach was used to find a temporally-varying value of N 0 parameter that minimizes the difference between soil moisture estimated with CRNS and in-situ sensors. Furthermore, the results showed that the relative change in the optimized value of N 0 (N 0,opt ) was well correlated with VPD in both orchards (R 2 = 0.66 for olive and R 2 = 0.74 for cherry orchards), indicating a strong correlation between these variables. These findings suggest that integrating VPD and CRNS observations, and using the VPD-N 0,opt correlation approach could be a promising way to account for the bias due to biomass dynamics on the estimation of area-averaged SM. • CRNS soil moisture affected by seasonal biomass water changes in orchards. • Vapor pressure deficit offers potential correction for biomass effects on CRNS signal. • CRNS overestimates soil moisture in dormancy, aligning well in warmer periods. • Time varying optimized N0 minimizes CRNS soil moisture estimation vs. in-situ.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Almashharawi et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20bdbfe4d6052211a30da5https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109493
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper