PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 1997AJP Heart and Circulatory Physiology25 citations

Pressure-independent effects of AT1-receptor antagonism on cardiovascular remodeling in aortic-banded rats

View Full Paper
CRChristopher P. ReganPAPeter G. AndersonSBSanford P. Bishop

Structured PICO

Does losartan improve cardiovascular remodeling in a rat model of pressure-overload hypertrophy?

P
Population
Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats with a subdiaphragmatic aortic band (pressure-overload model of cardiac hypertrophy)
I
Intervention
Losartan (250 mg/l)
C
Comparator
Untreated aortic-banded rats, and sham-operated controls (untreated or losartan-treated)
O
Outcome
Cardiovascular remodeling (minimal coronary resistance, coronary artery medial thickness, perivascular fibrosis, heart weights, and arterial pressures)surrogate

Angiotensin II receptor blockade with losartan prevents vascular and fibrotic changes in pressure-overload hypertrophy independent of arterial pressure reduction.

Abstract

To determine the role of angiotensin II-receptor blockade on cardiovascular remodeling in a pressure-overload model of cardiac hypertrophy, a subdiaphragmatic aortic band was placed in adult male Sprague-Dawley rats. Aortic-banded (AB) rats were left untreated or were losartan (Los; 250 mg/l) treated (AB-Los). Sham-operated (S) controls were either left untreated or treated with Los (S-Los). After 4 wk, rats were catheterized for measurement of mean arterial pressures carotid (CMAP) and femoral (FMAP), in mmHg. Hearts were perfused on a modified Langendorff system, and minimal coronary resistance (MCR) was determined. Hearts were then perfusion fixed, total and regional heart weights were recorded, and sections were processed for morphology. Changes in coronary artery medial thickness and perivascular fibrosis were assessed by quantitative image analysis. CMAP was significantly higher in AB and AB-Los than in S or S-Los (P < 0.05). There was no difference in FMAP in AB vs. S, but AB-Los and S-Los had lower FMAPs than S. Total heart weight and left ventricular weight-to-body weight ratios were increased in AB and AB-Los compared with S and S-Los (P < 0.05). MCR of AB was greater than S and S-Los. MCR of AB-Los was significantly lower than AB and was not significantly different from S and S-Los. In coronary vessels, medial thickness was greatest in AB, whereas there was no difference among AB-Los, S, and S-Los. Similarly, the increase in perivascular fibrosis was greatest in AB, and there was no difference among AB-Los, S, and S-Los. These data suggest that angiotensin II, independent of increased arterial pressure, is critical for the development of the vascular and fibrotic changes that occur in this model of pressure-overload hypertrophy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Regan et al. (1997) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20bf956aba112f1d33799bhttps://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1997.272.5.h2131
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper