PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 1982The Annals of Probability101 citationsOpen Access

Comparisons of Stop Rule and Supremum Expectations of I.I.D. Random Variables

THTheodore P. HillRKRobert P. Kertz

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Implicitly defined (and easily approximated) universal constants 1. 1 < aₙ < 1. 6, n = 2, 3, , are found so that if X₁, X₂, are i. i. d. non-negative random variables and if Tₙ is the set of stop rules for X₁, , Xₙ, then E (\X₁, , Xₙ\) aₙ \EXₜ: t Tₙ\, and the bound aₙ is best possible. Similar universal constants 0 < bₙ < 14 are found so that if the \Xᵢ\ are i. i. d. random variables taking values only in a, b, then E (\X₁, , Xₙ\) \EXₜ: t Tₙ\ + bₙ (b - a), where again the bound bₙ is best possible. In both situations, extremal distributions for which equality is attained (or nearly attained) are given in implicit form.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hill et al. (1982) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20d2b869aa0ec678ecaf4dhttps://doi.org/10.1214/aop/1176993861
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper