PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 1998Cytometry91 citations

Performance of calibration standards for antigen quantitation with flow cytometry

View Full Paper
RLRodiça LenkeiJGJan W. GratamaGRG. Rothe

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In the frame of the activities initiated by the Task Force for Antigen Quantitation of the European Working Group on Clinical Cell Analysis (EWGCCA), an experiment was conducted to evaluate microbead standards used for quantitative flow cytometry (QFCM). An unified window of analysis (UWA) was established on three different instruments (EPICS XL Coulter Corporation, Miami, FL, FACScan and FACS Calibur Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA) with QC3 microbeads (FCSC, PR). By using this defined fluorescence intensity scale, the performance of several monoclonal antibodies directed to CD3, CD4, and CD8 (conjugated and unconjugated), from three manufacturers (BDIS, Coulter Immunotech, and DAKO) was tested. In addition, the QIFI system (DAKO) and QuantiBRITE (BDIS), and a method of relative fluorescence intensity (RFI, method of Giorgi), were compared. mAbs reacting with three more antigens, CD16, CD19, and CD38 were tested on the FACScan instrument. Quantitation was carried out using a single batch of cryopreserved peripheral blood leukocytes, and all tests were performed as single color analyses. Significant correlations were observed between the antibody-binding capacity (ABC) values of the same CD antigen measured with various calibrators and with antibodies differing in respect to vendor, labeling and possible epitope recognition. Despite the significant correlations, the ABC values of most monoclonal antibodies differed by 20-40% when determined by the different fluorochrome conjugates and different calibrators. The results of this study indicate that, at the present stage of QFCM consistent ABC values may be attained between laboratories provided that a specific calibration system is used including specific calibrators, reagents, and protocols.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lenkei et al. (1998) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20d56710699ec7be2a9ddfhttps://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0320(19981001)33:2<188::aid-cyto13>3.0.co;2-q
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Determination of CD4 antigen density on cells: Role of antibody valency, avidity, clones, and conjugation1998 · 154 citations
  2. 2Standardizing flow cytometry: construction of a standardized fluorescence calibration plot using matching spectral calibrators1996 · 141 citations
  3. 3Expression of activation antigens, HLA-DR and CD38, on CD8 lymphocytes during HIV-1 infection1992 · 188 citations
  4. 4Chronic fatigue syndrome: clinical condition associated with immune activation1991 · 357 citations
  5. 5Lymphocyte Activation Markers in Peripheral Blood before and after Natural Exposure to Allergen in Asthmatic Patients2009 · 7 citations