PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 27, 2011Human Mutation37 citationsOpen Access

Mutation nomenclature in practice: Findings and recommendations from the cystic fibrosis external quality assessment scheme

View Full Paper
SBSarah BerwoutsMMMichael A. MorrisEGEmmanuelle Girodon

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Currently, two nomenclature systems are in use to describe sequence variants for cystic fibrosis: the established traditional nomenclature system and the more recent Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS) nomenclature system. We have evaluated the use of both systems in the laboratory reports of 217 participants in the cystic fibrosis external quality assessment scheme of 2009. The mutation c. 1521₁523delCTT (p. Phe508del, F508del) was described by traditional and HGVS nomenclature by 32 of 216 (15%) laboratories that correctly identified the mutation, whereas 171 (79%) laboratories used traditional nomenclature only and 13 (6%) laboratories used HGVS nomenclature only. Overall, 29 of 631 (5%) reports used nomenclature that was evaluated as being seriously incorrect and/or misleading and 136 (22%) reports contained attempts at HGVS coding, of which 104 (76%) contained no coding errors; just 33 (24%) mentioned the correct cDNA name and cited the nucleotide reference sequence. We recognized an urgent need for more consistent and correct usage of nomenclature. We recommended that cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator testing reports should include a description of the identified sequence variants in both HGVS and traditional nomenclature and provided basic recommendations and other guidance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Berwouts et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20d7ffb86afc182018062dhttps://doi.org/10.1002/humu.21569
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper