PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 2001European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery138 citationsOpen Access

Chronic β-blocker therapy improves outcome and reduces treatment costs in chronic type B aortic dissection

View Full Paper
MGMichele GenoniMPMatthias PaulRJRolf Jenni

Key Result

Beta-blocker therapy in patients with chronic type B aortic dissection was associated with greater freedom from subsequent aortic operation compared to other antihypertensives (80% vs 47%, P=0.001).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=71)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does beta-blocker treatment reduce the requirement for surgical intervention and treatment costs in patients with chronic type B aortic dissection?

P
Population
71 patients with chronic type B aortic dissection discharged alive on medical therapy, followed for a mean of 4.2 years.
E
Exposure
Beta-blocker treatment
C
Comparator
Other antihypertensive drugs
O
Outcome
Requirement for surgical intervention (freedom from subsequent aortic operation)hard clinical

Long-term beta-blocker therapy significantly reduces the need for subsequent aortic surgery, hospitalization time, and treatment costs in patients with chronic type B aortic dissection.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 80% vs 47%

p-value: p=0.001

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the medical treatment of chronic type B aortic dissection with beta-blockers versus other antihypertensive treatments in terms of their requirement for surgical intervention and treatment costs. METHODS: Case records of the 130 patients treated for aortic dissection type B in this unit between 1988 and 1997 were reviewed. Seventy-eight of 130 patients with chronic dissection have received isolated medical treatment. Seventy-one of 78 patients were discharged alive. Fifty-one of 71 received beta-blocker treatment, 20/71 were treated with other antihypertensive drugs. RESULTS: Surgery for aortic dissection became necessary in 20/71 patients (28%) during follow-up (mean, 4.2 years): 10/51 in the beta-blocker group and 9/20 in the other antihypertensive drug group. The freedom from subsequent aortic operation was 80 and 47%, respectively (P=0.001). Indications for emergency surgery were increased aortic diameter (79%), symptomatic aortic aneurysm (11%), and renal artery hypoperfusion (5%). The median hospitalization time during follow-up (dissection-related) was 2 days for patients who received beta-blockers and 16 days for patients who received other antihypertensive drug treatments (P=0.001). The cost of treatment/patient per year amounted to 644 and 12748 euros, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of patients with chronic type B dissection who receive initial medical management will later need surgery. Long-term treatment with beta-blockers reduces the progression of aortic dilatation, the incidence of subsequent hospital admissions, as well as the incidence of late dissection-related aortic procedures and the cost of treatment. Patients with chronic type B dissection need, in addition to frequent follow-up of aortic diameter, continuous treatment with beta-blocking agents.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Genoni et al. (2001) conducted a cohort in chronic type B aortic dissection (n=71). Beta-blockers vs. Other antihypertensive drugs was evaluated on Freedom from subsequent aortic operation (p=0.001). Beta-blocker therapy in patients with chronic type B aortic dissection was associated with greater freedom from subsequent aortic operation compared to other antihypertensives (80% vs 47%, P=0.001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20dce612bd648bba18015ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/s1010-7940(01)00662-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper