PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 1995Radiology274 citations

Prostate cancer: effect of postbiopsy hemorrhage on interpretation of MR images.

View Full Paper
SWS. WhiteHHHedvig HricakRFRosmarie Forstner

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the frequency of changes in signal intensity after prostatic biopsy and the effect of these changes on the magnetic resonance (MR) imaging staging of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-three patients with biopsy-proved prostate cancer were divided into two groups according to time between biopsy and imaging (less than and more than 21 days). The findings at MR imaging were compared with those at pathologic examination. RESULTS: Postbiopsy hemorrhage was detected in 21 of 26 (81%) patients who underwent imaging less than 21 days after biopsy and in 23 of 47 (49%) patients who underwent imaging more than 21 days after biopsy (P < .01). Postbiopsy changes persisted for as long as 4 1/2 months. Less than 21 days after biopsy, there was a tendency to overestimate tumor presence and extracapsular extension. After 21 days, tumor presence was underestimated but the positive predictive value for extracapsular extension was improved. Staging accuracy less than 21 days after biopsy was 46%; this improved to 83% after 21 days (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Staging accuracy is significantly improved when imaging is deferred for 21 days after biopsy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

White et al. (1995) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20df8910699ec7be2aac74https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.195.2.7724756
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper