PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 24, 2019Circulation Journal9 citationsOpen Access

Poor Quality of Warfarin Treatment Increases the Risk of All Types of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Atrial Fibrillation

PTPaula TiiliJPJukka PutaalaJMJuha Mehtälä

Key Result

Poor control of warfarin treatment (TTR60 ≤40%) was associated with a significantly higher risk of intracranial hemorrhage compared to optimal control (TTR60 >80%), with an adjusted HR of 2.16.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=53,953)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does poor quality of warfarin treatment (low TTR60) increase the risk of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with atrial fibrillation?

P
Population
53,953 unselected adult patients with atrial fibrillation on warfarin therapy, followed for a mean of 2.94 years.
E
Exposure
Poor quality of warfarin therapy, defined as time in therapeutic range in a 60-day window (TTR60) ≤40%.
C
Comparator
Excellent quality of warfarin therapy, defined as TTR60 >80%.
O
Outcome
Any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), including traumatic, non-traumatic, and ICH in multiple compartments with undetermined mechanisms.safety

In patients with atrial fibrillation, poor control of warfarin therapy (TTR60 ≤40%) is associated with a more than twofold increased risk of both traumatic and non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage compared to excellent control.

Main Result

Hazard Ratio: 2.16 (95% CI 1.83–2.54)

Absolute Event Rate: 1.35% vs 0.62%

p-value: p=<0.001

Limitations

  • Retrospective data from administrative registries not created for research purposes
  • Lack of data on smoking, alcohol consumption, dietary habits, or use of over-the-counter drugs like aspirin and NSAIDs
  • Potential underreporting of less severe diagnoses such as hypertension
  • Selection bias cannot be ruled out as only patients prescribed warfarin were included
  • Inability to control for factors associated with the decision to initiate or withhold warfarin treatment
  • Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were not included

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a devastating complication of oral anticoagulation. The aim of this study was to describe the spectrum of ICH and to evaluate the association of warfarin control with the risk of ICH in a nationwide cohort of unselected atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The FinWAF is a retrospective registry-linkage study. Data were collected from several nationwide Finnish health-care registers and laboratory databases. The primary outcome was any ICH (traumatic or non-traumatic). The quality of warfarin therapy was assessed continuously by calculating the time in therapeutic range in a 60-day window (TTR60). Adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were used. A total of 53,953 patients were included (53% men; mean age, 73 years; mean follow-up, 2.94 years; mean TTR, 63%). In 129,684 patient-years, 1,196 patients had ICH (non-traumatic, 53.5%; traumatic, 43.6%; traumatic subdural, 38.6%); crude annual rate, 0.92%; 95% CI: 0.87-0.98). A lower TTR60 was significantly associated with higher risk of ICH (TTR60 ≤40% vs. TTR60 >80%; adjusted hazard ratio, 2.16; 95% CI: 1.83-2.54). Other variables independently associated with ICH included age >65 years, previous stroke, male sex, low hemoglobin, thrombocytopenia, elevated alanine aminotransferase, and previous bleeding other than ICH. CONCLUSIONS: Poor control of warfarin treatment was associated with elevated risk of ICH. Approximately half of the ICH were traumatic, mainly subdural.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tiili et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Atrial Fibrillation (n=53,953). Poor quality of warfarin therapy (TTR60 ≤40%) vs. Optimal quality of warfarin therapy (TTR60 >80%) was evaluated on Any intracranial hemorrhage (traumatic or non-traumatic) (HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.83-2.54, p=<0.001). Poor control of warfarin treatment (TTR60 ≤40%) was associated with a significantly higher risk of intracranial hemorrhage compared to optimal control (TTR60 >80%), with an adjusted HR of 2.16.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20e290e2d1a39857ecbeaahttps://doi.org/10.1253/circj.cj-18-0975
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper