PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 13, 2021Brain Informatics74 citationsOpen Access

Evaluating deep learning EEG-based mental stress classification in adolescents with autism for breathing entrainment BCI

ASAvirath SundaresanBPBrian PenchinaSCSean Cheong

Key Result

A multiclass two-layer LSTM RNN deep learning classifier successfully identified mental stress from ongoing EEG with an overall accuracy of 93.27% in both ASD and neurotypical adolescents.

Structured PICO

Does a deep learning LSTM RNN classifier accurately identify mental stress from EEG in adolescents with and without autism?

P
Population
13 adolescents (8 with autism and 5 neurotypical) who underwent EEG recording during mental arithmetic stress induction and breathing tasks to evaluate stress classification algorithms.
I
Intervention
Deep learning classifiers (including LSTM RNN, CNN, LSTM-FCN) applied to EEG signals during mental arithmetic stress induction and breathing entrainment
C
Comparator
Conventional brain-computer interface (BCI) methods (FBCSP-SVM classifiers)
O
Outcome
Classification accuracy of mental stress states from EEGsurrogate

A two-layer LSTM RNN deep learning classifier can accurately identify mental stress states from EEG in adolescents with and without autism, offering promise for real-time stress mitigation via brain-computer interfaces.

Limitations

  • Mental stress induction via mental arithmetic was used as a proxy for anxiety, which varies significantly with context and individual.
  • Learning models were trained on an unbalanced dataset, with more breathing samples than stressor and baseline samples.
  • Small sample size, which is a major drawback for deep learning algorithms that typically rely on large datasets.
  • Unbalanced dataset due to longer length of breathing periods compared to stressor and baseline periods

Abstract

Mental stress is a major individual and societal burden and one of the main contributing factors that lead to pathologies such as depression, anxiety disorders, heart attacks, and strokes. Given that anxiety disorders are one of the most common comorbidities in youth with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), this population is particularly vulnerable to mental stress, severely limiting overall quality of life. To prevent this, early stress quantification with machine learning (ML) and effective anxiety mitigation with non-pharmacological interventions are essential. This study aims to investigate the feasibility of exploiting electroencephalography (EEG) signals for stress assessment by comparing several ML classifiers, namely support vector machine (SVM) and deep learning methods. We trained a total of eleven subject-dependent models-four with conventional brain-computer interface (BCI) methods and seven with deep learning approaches-on the EEG of neurotypical (n=5) and ASD (n=8) participants performing alternating blocks of mental arithmetic stress induction, guided and unguided breathing. Our results show that a multiclass two-layer LSTM RNN deep learning classifier is capable of identifying mental stress from ongoing EEG with an overall accuracy of 93.27%. Our study is the first to successfully apply an LSTM RNN classifier to identify stress states from EEG in both ASD and neurotypical adolescents, and offers promise for an EEG-based BCI for the real-time assessment and mitigation of mental stress through a closed-loop adaptation of respiration entrainment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sundaresan et al. (2021) studied Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and neurotypical (n=13). Two-layer LSTM RNN deep learning classifier vs. Conventional machine learning (FBCSP-SVM) and other deep learning classifiers was evaluated on Overall classification accuracy of mental stress from ongoing EEG. A multiclass two-layer LSTM RNN deep learning classifier successfully identified mental stress from ongoing EEG with an overall accuracy of 93.27% in both ASD and neurotypical adolescents.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20ea323b29bd64a5eb15ebhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40708-021-00133-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper