PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026ACS Sustainable Resource Management0 citationsOpen Access

Metal Adsorption Methods in Treated Sewage Using Bioadsorbents and Nanoadsorbents

View Full Paper
ELEmerson Leandro-SilvaMaterials Science & EngineeringAMAroldo Geraldo MagdalenaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)MPMarina Piacenti‐SilvaNational Institute of Meteorology

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the efficiency of bioadsorbents and nanoadsorbents in removing metal pollutants from treated sewage.
  • Analyzed seasonal variations in metal concentrations in treated sanitary sewage over one year.
  • Conducted adsorption experiments with banana peel flour (BPF) and Fe3O4@chitosan nanoparticles (MEC) under optimized conditions.
  • Monitored metal removal efficiency for aluminum (Al3+) and iron (Fe2+) in real treated sewage samples.
  • MEC achieved a removal efficiency of 76.8% for Fe2+, while BPF showed 53.5% for Al3+.
  • Al3+ and Fe2+ frequently exceeded regulatory limits in treated sewage.
  • Metal adsorption efficiency in TSS was lower than in previous studies involving simulated wastewater systems.

Abstract

Metals are persistent pollutants in aquatic ecosystems that pose significant environmental and public health risks. This study evaluated seasonal variations in metal concentrations in real treated sanitary sewage (TSS) from a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) and assessed the efficiency of two adsorbents for metal removal. Treated sewage samples were monitored over a one-year period, revealing that aluminum (Al3+) and iron (Fe2+) frequently exceeded the regulatory limits established for Class II receiving waters. Adsorption experiments were performed under optimized conditions (pH 6, 25 mg of the adsorbent, 25 mL of solution, 10 min contact time) using banana peel flour (BPF) as a bioadsorbent and Fe3O4@chitosan nanoparticles (MEC) as a nanoadsorbent. The results showed that MEC achieved higher removal efficiency for Fe2+ (76.8%), while BPF presented slightly higher removal efficiency for Al3+ (53.5%). However, adsorption efficiencies in TSS were lower than those previously observed in simulated wastewater systems, highlighting the influence of complex wastewater matrices on adsorption processes. These findings indicate that adsorption using BPF and MEC may serve as a complementary polishing step for reducing residual metal concentrations in wastewater treatment systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Leandro-Silva et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a211549d499ed480b16e906https://doi.org/10.1021/acssusresmgt.6c00053
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper