PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026Cureus0 citationsOpen Access

Technical Feasibility and Preliminary Safety Analysis of Intraoperative Electromyographic Neuromonitoring Using an Insulated Access Needle During Minimally Invasive Lumbar Pedicle Screw Fixation: A Retrospective Multicenter Series

FMFred MoBMBehnam MyersRPRajesh V. Patel

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the safety and technical feasibility of using an insulated access needle for intraoperative electromyographic monitoring during lumbar screw fixation.
  • Retrospective analysis of 367 lumbar pedicle screws placed in 75 consecutive patients across three independent centers.
  • Continuous triggered electromyography monitoring utilized with an insulated needle to assess screw placement accuracy.
  • Patients underwent neurological assessments post-surgery, focusing on screw placement complications.
  • No new postoperative neurological deficits were recorded among the 75 patients.
  • 92.9% (341 of 367) screws placed without repositioning due to adequate initial EMG thresholds.
  • In cases requiring repositioning (7.1%), an initial reading below 5 mA informed corrections, preventing deficits.

Abstract

Background Triggered electromyography (t-EMG) is used as an adjunct to fluoroscopy during minimally invasive lumbar pedicle screw fixation to detect potential cortical breaches. Its diagnostic accuracy depends on the electrical isolation properties of the stimulating instrument. Standard non-insulated Jamshidi needles allow current to disperse along the full needle shaft, which may reduce signal specificity at the pedicle tip. An insulated access needle with an adjustable depth stop (ALARA™ Neuro Access Needle; SurGenTec, LLC, Boca Raton, FL, USA) was used with continuous t-EMG monitoring in this series. Screw position was assessed by biplanar fluoroscopy and final t-EMG testing only; no postoperative CT was obtained in asymptomatic patients. Methods Retrospective post-market multi-center series. Three surgeons at independent sites placed 367 percutaneous lumbar pedicle screws in 75 consecutive patients (182 spinal levels, L1-S1, 2020-2021). An ALARA needle threshold of ≥5 mA was the adopted criterion before proceeding to guidewire placement. All patients underwent postoperative neurological assessment. Results No patient sustained a new postoperative neurological deficit attributable to screw malposition. Of 367 screws, 341 (92.9%) were placed without needle repositioning; 26 (7.1%) required repositioning because of sub-threshold EMG readings. One screw (0.3%) produced persistently low EMG values (final screw reading, 9 mA at L4) consistent with possible pedicle cortical proximity; this was flagged clinically, and the patient experienced no neurological sequelae on follow-up examination. ALARA needle readings of ≥5 mA preceded final screw readings of ≥10 mA in all cases in which repositioning was not required, an empirical offset consistent with differences in stimulating surface area between the needle tip and the screw. Conclusions Use of an insulated access needle with continuous t-EMG monitoring identified and enabled real-time correction of suboptimal needle trajectories in 26 of 367 screws (7.1%) before guidewire placement, with zero postoperative neurological deficits across 75 patients at three independent surgical sites using multiple implant systems. A needle-specific threshold of ≥5 mA consistently preceded final screw readings within the published safety range across all treated lumbar and sacral levels. These findings support needle-stage t-EMG monitoring with an insulated access needle as a practical, platform-independent tool for enhancing intraoperative safety during minimally invasive surgical (MIS) lumbar pedicle screw fixation, with prospective CT-correlated studies warranted to establish definitive threshold standards.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a211591d499ed480b16e9b4https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.110071
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Stimulus-Evoked EMG Monitoring During Transpedicular Lumbosacral Spine Instrumentation1994 · 207 citations
  2. 2The lumbar roots and pedicles: a morphometric analysis and anatomical features2008 · 20 citations
  3. 3Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion2003 · 620 citations
  4. 4Minimally Invasive Versus Open Laminectomy for Lumbar Stenosis2015 · 257 citations
  5. 5Malpractice litigation in elective lumbar spinal fusion: a comprehensive review of reported legal claims in the U.S. in the past 50 years2022 · 40 citations