PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments0 citationsOpen Access

Electrochemical signals can distinguish soil health across electrode sizes

View Full Paper
CWC. WebsterSGSuzanne GelstonJBJerome Babauta

Key Points

  • This work aims to determine if electrochemical signals can distinguish between healthy and less healthy soils using electrodes of different sizes.
  • Tested carbon fabric electrodes of sizes 64 cm², 16 cm², and 4 cm².
  • Measured microbial activity via chronoamperometry and cyclic voltammetry.
  • Conducted nutrient analysis and biological assays for soil health assessment.
  • All electrode sizes showed significant differences in current density and cyclic voltammograms between soil types.
  • 64 cm² electrodes had lower current density and slower response in chronoamperometry, indicating limitations in scalability.
  • Electrochemical signals effectively differentiated soil health across the tested electrode sizes.

Abstract

Microorganisms in soil are critical to nutrient cycling, moisture retention, and supporting plant productivity, making microbial activity one of the key indicators of soil health. Electrodes in soil can measure microbial activity via electrochemical signals, which can correlate with soil health. These signals include 1) continuous current generation via chronoamperometry, 2) cyclic response via cyclic voltammetry, and 3) redox potential via open circuit potential. Previously, we demonstrated that chronoamperometric and cyclic voltammograms could serve as a proxy to distinguish between healthy and less healthy soils. However, due to the heterogeneity of soil, it remains unclear whether electrode size influences the electrochemical response. The goal of this work is to determine whether electrochemical signals retain the ability to distinguish between healthy and less healthy soils characterized by nutrient analysis and biological assays across carbon fabric electrodes of three different sizes (64 cm 2 , 16 cm 2 , 4 cm 2 ). All electrode sizes tested measured significant differences in current density and cyclic voltammograms between soil types. However, 64 cm 2 electrodes exhibited lower current density and slower response in chronoamperometry, indicating limitations in the scalability of biofilm electrodes in soil. The electrochemical signals reflecting microbial activity differentiated soil health across the tested electrode sizes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Webster et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2115bdd499ed480b16eb4dhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2026.105096
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper