PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026npj Digital Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Mixed-methods study on GenAI Usage, dependence behaviors, and standardized application paths among Chinese medical students

View Full Paper
LFLiujie FuRLRuifeng LiWSWuxiang Shi

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore the usage and dependence behaviors of Chinese medical students regarding generative artificial intelligence (GenAI).
  • Explanatory sequential mixed-methods design employed with a quantitative phase utilizing survey data from 1295 medical students.
  • Qualitative phase involved thematic analysis of interviews with 16 medical educators to investigate underlying mechanisms.
  • Multivariate linear regression analysis used to assess correlations between GenAI dependency and various factors.
  • 60% of students reported dependence on GenAI with a mean dependency score of 21.91 ± 6.75.
  • Performance expectancy, academic pressure, and social influence correlated positively with GenAI dependency, while critical thinking correlated negatively.
  • Tool selection favored general-purpose platforms; specialist tools were greatly underutilized, and clinical applications remained below 20%.

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is reshaping medical education while fostering technological dependence among students. This study employed an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. In the quantitative phase, an empirical analysis was conducted using survey data collected from a sample of 1295 Chinese medical students. The subsequent qualitative phase involved thematic analysis of interview transcripts from 16 medical educators to elucidate the underlying mechanisms. Findings reveal that GenAI was deeply integrated into medical students’ daily learning routines. Tool selection favored general-purpose platforms, whereas specialist medical tools exhibited exceptionally low utilization rates. The clinical application possibilities remained below 20% across all situations. With an overall dependency score of 21.91 ± 6.75, over 60% of students reported dependence on GenAI. Multivariate linear regression analysis indicated performance expectancy, academic pressure, and social influence showed significant positive correlations with GenAI dependency. Conversely, critical thinking exhibited a significant negative correlation. Future medical education should strategically reposition GenAI as a “cognitive scaffold” by reinforcing critical thinking and establishing standardized usage guidelines to facilitate high-quality development.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2115bdd499ed480b16ec6bhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02839-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Dependence on Generative Artificial Intelligence Among Medical Students and Its Association With Critical Thinking: A Cross-Sectional Study2026 · 1 citations
  2. 2Medical students perceptions and attitudes toward the use of generative artificial intelligence in clinical decision-making: a nationwide cross-sectional survey in China2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3Assessing Generative AI Adoption, Tool Preferences, and Cognitive Reliance Among Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Study2026
  4. 4Studying with GenAI: cross-sectional study on usage patterns, needs, competencies, and ethical perspectives of medical informatics students2025 · 8 citations
  5. 5What are medical students really doing with GenAI in their self-study? An epistemic entanglement framework approach2026 · 1 citations