PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026Journal of Nanotheranostics1 citationsOpen Access

Nanomaterial-Based Biosensors: Sensing Mechanisms, Performance Determinants, and Applications

View Full Paper
SMSugandika MaparathneRIRafiqul IslamMGMelissa Ariza Gonzalez

Key Points

  • This review aims to explore the relationships between nanomaterial characteristics and their roles in biosensing.
  • Utilizes a structure-property-function framework to link nanomaterial properties to biosensing performance.
  • Classifies nanomaterials based on functional roles, including plasmonic and electroactive architectures.
  • Evaluates recent advances in clinical, environmental, and food safety applications.
  • Discusses performance parameters like sensitivity, selectivity, and limit of detection, emphasizing their link to material properties.
  • Identifies limitations in reproducibility and long-term stability that impact biosensor effectiveness.
  • Highlights future directions for enhancing biosensor development in various analytical contexts.

Abstract

Nanomaterial-based biosensors have advanced analytical methodologies by enhancing signal transduction, interfacial reactivity, and molecular recognition across diverse sensing platforms. In parallel, the diversity of nanomaterial compositions, architectures, and interfacial designs has expanded the range of available sensing strategies and performance outcomes. This review addresses limitations through a structure–property–function framework that links nanomaterial characteristics to sensing behavior, performance determinants, and application-specific requirements. Within this framework, nanomaterials are classified according to their dominant functional roles in biosensing, including plasmonic, electroactive, fluorescent and quantum-confined, porous, and hybrid architectures. The influence of morphology, surface chemistry, conductivity, and interfacial design on electrochemical, optical, and hybrid transduction mechanisms is critically examined, and key performance parameters, including sensitivity, selectivity, limit of detection, response time, stability, and reproducibility, are discussed in relation to material properties and sensing configuration. Recent advances in clinical biomarker detection, pathogen and nucleic acid analysis, and environmental and food safety monitoring are also evaluated to illustrate how nanomaterial design is tailored to different analytical contexts. Current limitations related to reproducibility, interface engineering, long-term stability, and scalable device integration are highlighted, together with future directions for the rational development of robust and application-oriented biosensor platforms.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Maparathne et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2115d7d499ed480b16eeadhttps://doi.org/10.3390/jnt7020013
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: Advances in Synthesis, Mechanistic Understanding, and Magnetic Property Optimization for Improved Biomedical Performance2025 · 25 citations
  2. 2Magnetic Immunoassay Based on Au Pt Bimetallic Nanoparticles/Carbon Nanotube Hybrids for Sensitive Detection of Tetracycline Antibiotics2024 · 12 citations
  3. 3Fullerene-based PEC aptasensor with DNA super sandwich structures and Pb2+-G quadruplex structures2024 · 2 citations
  4. 4A press-actuated slidable microfluidic colorimetric biosensor for Salmonella detection utilizing nickel mesh sheet and MIL-88@Pd/Pt nanoparticles2024 · 6 citations
  5. 5Nanoporous Graphene Integrated onto Bimodal Waveguide Biosensors for Detection of C-Reactive Protein2025 · 12 citations