PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026Molecular Biology0 citations

Effect of ESR1 Somatic Mutations on SERM/SERD Binding: Insights from Molecular Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulations

View Full Paper
IMI. V. MargatskiyAEA. M. EliseikinVAV. E. Artemov

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate how ESR1 somatic mutations influence binding affinities of SERDs in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.
  • Comprehensive computational approach using molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations.
  • Binding free energy calculations (MM-GBSA) assessed affinities of SERDs with ERα mutants.
  • Analysis of structural stability through root-mean-square fluctuation (RMSF) and hydrogen bond stability assessments.
  • Vepdegestrant and fulvestrant bind less effectively to double mutants (e.g., Y537C/D538G) compared to native ERα.
  • ZB716 shows equal or superior binding affinity to most ERα mutants, maintaining stable hydrogen bonds with Glu353.
  • Insights support the design of new SERDs targeted at overcoming ESR1 mutation-driven resistance.

Abstract

Acquired resistance to endocrine therapy poses a major limitation in the treatment of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer (BC). Somatic mutations of the ESR1 gene, which encodes ERα, are one of the key resistance mechanisms. However, the effect of mutations and especially double mutations on the binding of novel drugs remains insufficiently understood. To evaluate the effect of the mutations at the molecular level, a comprehensive computational approach was employed, including molecular docking, binding free energy calculations (MM-GBSA), and molecular dynamics simulations. A comparative analysis revealed opposite effects of ESR1 mutations on affinities of various selective ER degraders (SERDs). Vepdegestrant and fulvestrant were found to bind far less efficiently with ERα mutants and especially double mutants (e.g., Y537C/D538G) than with the native ERα. In contrast, the SERD ZB716 demonstrated the same or even better binding with most mutants. A potential structural cause of its resilience to mutations was identified via a comprehensive analysis, which included the evaluation of individual amino acid residue mobility through root-mean-square fluctuation (RMSF) calculations and an assessment of intermolecular hydrogen bond stability. ZB716 was shown to maintain a stable hydrogen bond with Glu353, and the bond was preserved in the ERα mutants. A lower stability of this key interaction was observed with fulvestrant. The findings elucidate the molecular mechanism of ESR1 mutation-driven resistance and support the promise of ZB716 as a compound capable of overcoming resistance conferred by a subset of the most common somatic ESR1 mutations in BC patients. The results justify the targeted design of new SERDs aimed at interacting with ERα mutants and outline an avenue of further research in the field of personalized therapy for ER+ BC.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Margatskiy et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2115f6d499ed480b16ef08https://doi.org/10.1134/s0026893325603799
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Investigating Lasofoxifene Efficacy Against the Y537S + F404V Double-Mutant Estrogen Receptor Alpha Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations2024 · 11 citations
  2. 2A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods1984 · 19,293 citations
  3. 3Molecular dynamics simulations and novel drug discovery2017 · 529 citations
  4. 4Estrogen receptor (ESR1) mutation in bone metastases from breast cancer2017 · 37 citations
  5. 5Molecular Docking: Shifting Paradigms in Drug Discovery2019 · 2,348 citations