PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026Materials0 citationsOpen Access

Geometry and Surface Feature Evaluation in E-PBF Process Using In-Operando Electron Emission Signal

View Full Paper
AAAbdulaziz AlfaifiOAOmer A. AlshammeryTTToan D. Truong

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess whether in-operando electron emission signals during melting can indicate geometric and topographical features of parts.
  • In-operando electron emission signals were recorded during the melting of a Ti-6Al-4V spur gear.
  • Optical microscopy and profilometry provided ground truth for the observations.
  • A correction for melt-pool dilation was applied to improve the accuracy of geometric reconstructions.
  • The in-operando reconstruction achieved an agreement deviation below 2.2%, comparable to post-melt imaging results.
  • Strong correlations were found between the electron emission signal and profilometer height profiles (Pearson 0.67–0.87, p < 0.05).
  • The findings indicate that the electron emission signal can effectively capture variations in surface topography alongside geometric features.

Abstract

Electron beam powder bed fusion (E-PBF) requires reliable in situ process monitoring, and electron emission signals offer a promising avenue for this purpose. Most prior studies have relied on dedicated beam scans performed before or after melting, leaving open the question of whether the signal acquired during the melt itself can directly indicate geometric and topographical features of the fabricated part. In this work, the in-operando electron emission signal was recorded during spot-melting of a Ti-6Al-4V spur gear and evaluated for its ability to reconstruct geometric features and surface topography, with optical microscopy and profilometry serving as ground truth. A melt-pool dilation correction was applied to compensate for the geometric expansion of individual melt spots. After correction, the in-operando reconstruction reached agreement deviation values below 2.2% across the tooth tips, tooth bases, and chord widths, which are comparable to or better than those obtained from post-melt ELO imaging. Comparison with profilometer height profiles confirmed strong correlation with surface topography (Pearson 0.67–0.87 across all four profiles, p < 0.05 for all), indicating that the signal captures meaningful surface-topography variation in addition to geometric boundaries. The results demonstrate that the in-operando electron emission signal shows strong potential for in situ geometric and topographical assessment of complex parts in E-PBF, supporting its future integration into closed-loop process monitoring.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alfaifi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2115f6d499ed480b16ef33https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19112362
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Build Surface Topography Determination in Electron Beam Powder Bed Fusion using Electron Optical Imaging2026
  2. 2Effect of parametric modifications and post-processing on surface properties for Ti-6Al-4V manufactured using electron beam powder bed fusion2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3In situ build surface topography determination in electron beam powder bed fusion2024 · 5 citations
  4. 4Extracting powder bed features via electron optical images during electron beam powder bed fusion2024 · 3 citations
  5. 5Columnar to Equiaxed Transition in Electron Beam Powder Bed Fusion (EB‐PBF) Characterized Through Microstructure Analytics2026