PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026Oncology and Translational Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Adoption of the distal transradial approach in percutaneous coronary intervention: A contemporary review

View Full Paper
YCYuehua ChenHLHongmei LiuMWMan Wang

Key Points

  • This review explores the benefits and challenges of adopting the distal transradial approach in percutaneous coronary interventions.
  • Comprehensive review of existing literature on distal transradial approach in PCI.
  • Evaluation of technical features, advantages, and challenges of dTRA compared to conventional methods.
  • Discussion on ongoing controversies and future directions in training and device innovations.
  • dTRA shows shorter hemostasis time and lower radial artery occlusion rates compared to conventional methods.
  • Challenges include a steeper learning curve and limitations in certain anatomical variations.
  • Future efforts may address current controversies and expand evidence from randomized trials.

Abstract

This comprehensive review examined the application of the distal transradial approach (dTRA) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The dTRA, characterized by its unique anatomical access site in the anatomical snuffbox, demonstrates distinct features for both puncture and hemostasis techniques. dTRA offers several advantages compared with conventional transradial access, including shorter hemostasis time, reduced incidence of access-site hematoma and compartment syndrome, lower rates of radial artery occlusion, enhanced patient and operator comfort, and a potential for retrograde recanalization of the occluded radial arteries. However, it also presents challenges, including a steeper learning curve, limitations related to a smaller arterial diameter, and constraints in patients with taller stature or specific anatomical variations. Clinically, dTRA has been used in diverse patient cohorts, including patients with acute coronary syndrome, those undergoing complex PCI procedures, and individuals with preexisting radial artery occlusion. Although ongoing clinical controversies exist regarding its universal adoption, these could be addressed through technical refinements, standardized training, and device innovations. Future directions include optimizing procedural protocols, expanding evidence from randomized trials, and exploring technological advancements to enhance feasibility. Overall, this review summarizes and evaluates the current evidence to provide a foundational reference for the broader implementation and further investigation of dTRA in PCI.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2115f6d499ed480b16ef6fhttps://doi.org/10.1097/ot9.0000000000000147
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper