PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026Journal of Clinical Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

A New Method for Measuring Structural Limb-Length Discrepancy: A Quasi-Experimental Study

View Full Paper
HAHuthaifa AtallahTQTiteana QufabzMAMahmoud Alfatafta

Key Points

  • This study aims to develop a new method for measuring structural limb-length discrepancy using the position of malleoli.
  • Quasi-experimental design involving 18 participants
  • Participants underwent four measurement tests including PMMLT and standard methods
  • Validity assessed against radiography results
  • Mean limb-length discrepancy measured by radiography was 2.99 ± 1.69 cm
  • PMMLT results were comparable with negligible bias: −0.01 cm
  • PMMLT showed very strong correlation with radiography (r = 0.996, p < 0.001)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Limb-length discrepancy (LLD) is a relatively common condition, with structural LLD characterized by true shortening of a bony structure. Although various clinical and radiological methods are available, none rely exclusively on position of malleoli relative to one another. This study aims to introduce a novel method for measuring structural LLD using malleoli in conjunction with a ruler. A quasi-experimental study. Methods: Eighteen participants with structural LLD were recruited from an orthopaedic clinic. Each participant underwent four tests: Paired Medial Malleolus Level Test (PMMLT) (new method), measuring tape method (Anterior Superior Iliac Spine (ASIS) to Medial Malleoli (MM), standing-block test, and full-length standing (long bone) radiography. Validity was assessed against radiography. Results: The mean ± SD LLD measured by radiography was 2.99 ± 1.69 cm. Corresponding values were obtained with the PMMLT (2.98 ± 1.69 cm), measuring tape method (2.95 ± 1.66 cm), and the standing-block test (2.92 ± 1.73 cm). No significant differences were found among the methods (χ2(3) = 3.43, p = 0.330). Correlations with radiography were very strong (PMMLT r = 0.996; measuring tape method r = 0.990; standing-block test r = 0.991; all p < 0.001). PMMLT showed negligible bias (−0.01 cm), the narrowest 95% limits of agreement (−0.32 to 0.30 cm), and the lowest RMSE (0.15 cm). Conclusions: The PMMLT demonstrates accuracy and practicality while being simple, cost-effective, and free of radiation exposure, making it a valuable alternative for clinical assessment of LLD in settings where imaging is unavailable or contraindicated.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Atallah et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2115f6d499ed480b16ef74https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15114309
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper