PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026Applied Cognitive Psychology0 citations

Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity Affect How Readers Skim Expository Text

View Full Paper
CSChristopher A. SanchezCPCourtney Powell

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore how individual differences in working memory capacity affect text skimming and comprehension.
  • Two experiments conducted where participants skimmed a science text.
  • First experiment involved reading one paragraph at a time on computer; the second utilized eyetracking for the entire text.
  • Participants' responses measured the relationship between working memory capacity and reading efforts.
  • Higher working memory capacity was positively related to better understanding of skimmed text.
  • Participants with greater working memory capacity spread their reading efforts more evenly across the text.
  • Consistent results were found in both experimental settings.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Skimming, or rapid scanning of text, manifests when readers are constrained by time or other pressuring factors. While normal reading behavior has previously been connected to differences in working memory capacity (WMC), an open question is whether this also holds true for non‐normal reading like text skimming? Two studies were conducted where participants skimmed a short science text. In the first experiment participants read a paragraph at a time on a computer, and in the second experiment participants read the entire text whilst being eyetracked. Results were identical across both experiments; WMC was positively related to both understanding the text and the likelihood that a reader equitably spread their reading efforts across the text. This suggests that differences in WMC predict how well readers manage reading efforts and engage in more sampling‐like reading, ultimately leading to better understanding of a skimmed text.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sanchez et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a21164cd499ed480b16f35ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/acp.70226
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Exploring the Characteristics and Attitudes of Electronic Textbook Users and Nonusers2024 · 6 citations
  2. 2Allocating Time Across Multiple Texts: Sampling and Satisficing2007 · 52 citations
  3. 3Working Memory1974 · 5,302 citations
  4. 4The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory.2007 · 1,325 citations
  5. 5The Active Skim: Efficient Reading as a Moral Challenge in Postgraduate Education2017 · 13 citations