PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Competitiveness in the Ports of the Strait of Gibraltar: TEUs as a Key Factor between Algeciras and Tangier Med

View Full Paper
JMJesús Gabriel Moreno-NavarroNANissrine Ahaboune

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the competitive positions of Algeciras and Tangier Med ports by analyzing various factors affecting their container traffic.
  • Developed a competitiveness matrix incorporating both endogenous and exogenous factors.
  • Conducted quantitative analysis of container throughput (TEUs) from 2016 to 2024.
  • Analyzed port performance based on connectivity, capacity, and cost competitiveness.
  • Tangier Med's container throughput reached 10.24 million TEUs in 2024, surpassing Algeciras.
  • During the Red Sea crisis, 90% of Asia-Europe routes shifted to the Cape of Good Hope, impacting voyage times significantly.
  • Tangier Med exhibited superior connectivity to major European hubs compared to Algeciras, despite Algeciras's advantages in hinterland logistics.

Abstract

The Strait of Gibraltar is a strategic maritime node where the ports of Algeciras (Spain) and Tangier Med (Morocco) compete directly for container traffic on Europe-Asia and transatlantic routes. This study develops a comprehensive competitiveness matrix that includes endogenous (port-controlled) and exogenous (external) factors to assess their relative positioning. The matrix explicitly analyzes endogenous factors—terminal capacity, crane productivity, large-vessel service capacity, cost competitiveness, and transport cost distribution—and exogenous factors—hinterland distance, competitor port dispersion, mainline operator concentration (Maersk, MSC, CMA-CGM), hinterland accessibility (rail, road), and tourism activity. Quantitative analysis of container throughput (TEUs, 2016-2024) reveals Tangier Med's continuous growth (10.24 million TEUs in 2024), surpassing Algeciras, particularly during the Red Sea crisis, when 90% of Asia- Europe routes diverted via the Cape of Good Hope, adding 3,800 nautical miles and 9-11 days per voyage. Key analytical findings identify a clear hinterland-foreland disparity: Tangier Med demonstrates superior foreland connectivity to the Rotterdam, Genoa, and Hamburg hubs, with optimized vessel calling patterns that reduce waiting and handling times, while Algeciras maintains hinterland advantages through intermodal logistics areas and European market access despite delayed rail modernization. Tangier Med benefits from greater regulatory flexibility and free zones, offsetting Algeciras's infrastructural advantages. These results provide an objective framework for understanding the strategic positioning of both ports and their supply chain implications in the Strait of Gibraltar.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Moreno-Navarro et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a21164cd499ed480b16f3echttps://doi.org/10.5821/mt.15928
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Mediterranean container port reconfiguration under geopolitical disruption: an AIS-based multi-scale analysis2026 · 2 citations
  2. 2Evaluation of Mediterranean market container ports using Boston Consulting Group Matrix2024
  3. 3Gaining Competitive Advantage through Green Port Technologies – Case of Selected Adriatic and Ionian Ports2025 · 4 citations
  4. 4An Assessment of Container Seaport Efficiency Determinants2024 · 3 citations
  5. 5Assessing the Impact of Port Structure on Shoreline Evolution: Case Study of Tangier Med Port, Morocco2024