PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026Journal of Surgical Oncology0 citationsOpen Access

Dynamic Prognostic Nutritional Index With Circulating Tumor DNA Predicts Survival in Localized Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

View Full Paper
AHAlex HorowitzCSClaire ShenDVDominic Vitello

Key Points

  • This research aims to determine how changes in the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and tumor DNA levels predict survival in patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
  • Analyzed 127 patients with localized PDAC in a prospective biomarker study (2020-2024).
  • Calculated PNI and assessed KRAS ctDNA using digital droplet PCR at five timepoints.
  • Conducted survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods.
  • Low PNI (< 45) at diagnosis was linked to worse overall survival (OS) with p = 0.043.
  • PNI declined significantly during treatment (p < 0.001), indicating worsening nutritional status.
  • In multivariable analysis, PNI decline during chemotherapy was a significant mortality predictor (HR 1.095, 95% CI 1.042-1.152, p < 0.001).

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prognostic significance of baseline and longitudinal changes in prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and to assess the complementary prognostic value of PNI with tumor burden measured by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). METHODS: We analyzed 127 patients with localized PDAC enrolled in a prospective biomarker study (2020-2024). Laboratory values were collected at five standardized timepoints. PNI was calculated as (10 × albumin) + (0.005 × lymphocyte count). KRAS ctDNA was assessed using digital droplet PCR. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression, with longitudinal changes assessed using Friedman testing. RESULTS: Low PNI (< 45) at diagnosis was associated with worse OS (p = 0.043). PNI declined significantly across treatment timepoints (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, decline in PNI during neoadjuvant chemotherapy independently predicted worse OS (HR 1.095, 95% CI 1.042-1.152, p < 0.001). Patients with both low PNI and ctDNA positivity had a 3.64-fold increased risk of death (HR 3.64, 95% CI 1.32-10.04, p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: PNI is a dynamic, clinically accessible biomarker that independently predicts survival in localized PDAC. Integration of PNI with ctDNA improves prognostic stratification by capturing both patient host vulnerability and tumor burden.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Horowitz et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a21164cd499ed480b16f482https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70296
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper