PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026Sustainability0 citationsOpen Access

Environmental Performance of Circular Cascade Hydroponic Systems: A PEFCR-Based Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Cucumber and Melon Production

View Full Paper
SKStyliani KonstantinidiNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensAVAnna VatsanidouNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensVAVasileios AnestisAgricultural University of Athens

Key Points

  • This study aims to assess the environmental performance of a novel Cascade Hydroponic System (CHS) compared to a conventional Separated Hydroponic System (SHS).
  • Conducted a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) based on Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCRs) using primary data.
  • Monitored nutrient concentrations in effluent from CHS to analyze resource recovery and reuse.
  • Benchmarked CHS against SHS for the simultaneous production of 1.0 kg of cucumber and 1.0 kg of melon.
  • CHS resulted in a 65.7% reduction in Water Use, 41.8% reduction in Climate Change score, and 30% reduction in Freshwater Eutrophication score compared to SHS.
  • Overall, CHS showed a 58% lower total environmental footprint score than SHS.
  • Process analysis identified that fertilizers contributed less to the environmental impacts in CHS than in SHS.

Abstract

Conventional hydroponic systems, although resource-efficient, face significant sustainability challenges due to the discharge of nutrient-rich effluents, resulting in severe environmental pressures. In alignment with the European Union’s “Farm to Fork” strategy, innovative circular economy approaches are required to decouple crop production from environmental degradation. This study evaluates a novel Cascade Hydroponic System (CHS), designed to maximize resource utility by recovering and reusing the drainage from a primary salt-sensitive crop (cucumber) to a secondary, more salt-tolerant cultivation (melon). A comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is performed in accordance with the Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCRs), utilizing primary operational data and direct monitoring of nutrient concentrations in the system’s effluent. The convergence of these elements establishes the novelty of this study. The CHS is benchmarked against a conventional Separated Hydroponic System (SHS) for a functional unit (FU) defined as “the simultaneous production of 1.0 kg of cucumber and 1.0 kg of melon”. The CHS demonstrated lower characterized impacts compared to SHS across all 16 assessed Environmental Footprint categories under the examined pilot-scale conditions. The key findings include reductions of 65.7%, 41.8%, and 30% in Water Use, Climate Change, and Freshwater Eutrophication scores, respectively. Based on the normalization results, the CHS revealed a 58% lower total environmental footprint score compared to SHS. Process contribution analysis indicates that the marked decrease in the environmental burden is associated with the use of fertilizers. While these inputs represent a significant share of the conventional system’s impact scores, their contribution was substantially lower in the CHS. Although based on pilot-scale operational data from a single crop cycle, the results highlight the considerable environmental potential of cascading nutrient reuse configurations, thus enhancing resource use efficiency and mitigating the associated environmental impacts while also contributing novel empirical knowledge to a field that has been limitedly studied.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Konstantinidi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a211670d499ed480b16f52bhttps://doi.org/10.3390/su18115477
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper