PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026Applied Sciences1 citationsOpen Access

A Review of Airport Security and Resilience Analysis: Integration of Risk Modelling Frameworks

View Full Paper
LLLintong LiYLYunhao LiWOWashington Yotto Ochieng

Key Points

  • This review aims to evaluate existing airport security frameworks and their effectiveness in addressing multifaceted threats.
  • Structured review of conceptual frameworks and threat landscapes.
  • Comparative analysis of risk assessment approaches and their limitations.
  • Adoption of Threat-Vulnerability-Risk Assessment for metric allocation and resilience planning.
  • Existing approaches effectively identify and prioritize threats but lack scalability and real-time applicability.
  • Threat-Vulnerability-Risk Assessment fosters transition from static risk scores to dynamic resilience planning.
  • Static structures limit capturing of temporal dynamics and interdependencies, necessitating integration with dynamic models.

Abstract

Airports, as Critical National Infrastructure (CNI), operate as tightly coupled socio-technical systems exposed to multifaceted threats, including cyber, physical, social, environmental, and Chemical, Biological and Radiological (CBR) threats. This study presents a structured review of the synthesis of conceptual frameworks, airport structural configurations, sensor networks, and multi-domain threat landscapes, as well as airport security and resilience analysis, while comparatively examining risk assessment approaches. The review shows that existing approaches are effective for threat identification and prioritisation but remain predominantly static, with limitations in scalability, data dependency, and real-time applicability. To address these limitations, Threat-Vulnerability-Risk Assessment (TVRA) is adopted as a structured, reusable approach to support metric allocation, redundancy design, and emergency capability development. It further serves as a bridge between traditional risk assessment and resilience-oriented system design by enabling the transformation of static risk scores into scenario-based inputs, thereby supporting stress-testing and lifecycle-based resilience planning across the prepare, act, and recover phases. However, its inherently static structure limits its ability to capture temporal dynamics and cascading interdependencies, highlighting the need to integrate it with dynamic modelling approaches.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a211689d499ed480b16f75fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/app16115406
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper