PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026Procedia Computer Science0 citationsOpen Access

Identifying ridehail riders through pairing ActivitySim and BEAM

View Full Paper
GMGregory S. MacfarlaneCDChristopher DayGEGregory D. Erhardt

Key Points

  • This research investigates how combining two modeling approaches can accurately forecast ride-hailing demand and service levels.
  • Utilized ActivitySim for generating daily plans as inputs for the BEAM multi-agent simulation.
  • Constructed nine methodological combinations using different models and utility functions.
  • Estimated ride-hailing ridership and service levels for each combination.
  • The choice of mode model structure significantly influenced ride-hailing ridership and service level estimates.
  • Multi-agent simulations predicted a higher demand for ride-hailing compared to activity-based models.
  • Identified potential for future research to create feedback loops to balance forecasts between both models.

Abstract

The advent of on-demand transport modes such as ride-hailing and microtransit has challenged forecasters to develop new methods of forecasting the use and impacts of such modes. In particular, there is some professional disagreement about the relative role of activity-based transportation behavior models — which have detailed understanding of the person making a trip and its purpose — and multi-agent demand simulations which may have a better understanding of the availability and service characteristics of on-demand services. A particular question surrounds how the relative strengths of these two approaches might be successfully paired in practice. Using daily plans generated by the activity-based model ActivitySim as inputs to the BEAM multi-agent simulation, we construct nine different methodological combinations by allowing the choice to use a pooled ride-hail service in ActivitySim, in BEAM with different utility functions, or in both. Within each combination, we estimate ride-hailing ridership and level of service measures. The results suggest that mode choice model structure drastically affects ride-hailing ridership and level of service. In addition, we see that multi-agent simulation overstates the demand interest relative to an activity-based model, but there may be opportunities in future research to implement feedback loops to balance the ridership and level of service forecasts between the two models.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Macfarlane et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a211689d499ed480b16f809https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2026.04.038
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Utilizing multi-stage behavior change theory to model the process of bike share adoption2019 · 37 citations
  2. 2Factors affecting heterogeneity in willingness to use e-scooter sharing services2021 · 119 citations
  3. 3Activity-Based Model: Requisite for a New Travel Demand Forecasting Approach for India2022 · 3 citations
  4. 4Modeling and Multi-agent Simulation of Bicycle Sharing2014 · 7 citations
  5. 5What type of infrastructures do e-scooter riders prefer? A route choice model2021 · 142 citations