PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026Ancient Philosophy Today0 citations

Response to Manekin: Reading Aristotle through Gersonides: Innatism, Scepticism, and Empiricism

View Full Paper
DBDavid Bronstein

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze Gersonides’ interpretation of first principles in light of Aristotle's philosophy and to explore the dichotomy between innatism, scepticism, and empiricism.
  • Engaged with Charles Manekin's interpretation of Gersonides' account of first principles.
  • Discussed a long passage from Gersonides quoted in Manekin's paper.
  • Analyzed the distinction between different theses on sense-perception and its role in acquiring first principles.
  • Gersonides argues against both innatism and scepticism, presenting a defense of Aristotle's views.
  • Distinction is made between two theses regarding sense-perception: one on causation and another on justification.

Abstract

This paper engages with Charles Manekin’s interpretation of Gersonides’ account of our acquisition of first principles. I argue that reflecting on Gersonides’ approach to innatism, scepticism, and empiricism affords us insight into Aristotle’s thought. I discuss a long passage from Gersonides quoted and discussed in Manekin’s paper. I argue that Gersonides argues against two views contrary to Aristotle’s and Averroes’ position: innatism and scepticism. I then turn to Manekin’s account of Gersonides’ empiricism, arguing that we should distinguish between two theses concerning sense-perception’s contribution to our acquisition of first principles: one concerning causation and another concerning justification.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

David Bronstein (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2116cfd499ed480b16fb02https://doi.org/10.3366/anph.2026.0136
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper