PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Boundary Objects & Open Education: Reflections from the Bottom-Up Practice of a European Alliance

View Full Paper
DSDeborah Sielert

Key Points

  • To explore how a consulting service can use boundary objects to facilitate collaboration within a university alliance.
  • Reflection on the EULiST-Seminarcheck consulting process
  • Demonstration of a course functioning as a boundary object
  • Analysis of lessons learned from implementing the consulting service
  • The process effectively navigates the tension between standardization and interpretive flexibility
  • Necessary boundary work requires significant time and resources
  • Facilitated bottom-up cooperation in teaching practices among partner universities

Abstract

The paper reflects on the “EULiST-Seminarcheck”, a consulting service designed to open-up courses to partner universities within a university alliance through freely licensed materials. Using an exemplary consulting process it demonstrates how a course functions as a boundary object within the alliance, thereby facilitating bottom-up-cooperation in higher education teaching. The reflection offers “lessons learned” and argues that, as a boundary object, the process successfully navigates the tension between standardization and interpretive flexibility in the alliance, the necessary boundary work by teaching staff requires time, know-how, and resources.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Deborah Sielert (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2116fad499ed480b16fe25https://doi.org/10.34657/36734
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper