PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 11, 2010Haemophilia469 citations

Range of motion measurements: reference values and a database for comparison studies

View Full Paper
JSJ. Michael SoucieCWChang-Wen WangAFAngela Forsyth

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Many diseases and injuries can impair joint mobility. Normal reference values are needed to determine extent of impairment to assess and monitor joint motion. There is very little published data describing normal joint range of motion (ROM) for healthy men and women across a wide span of ages. We enrolled male and female subjects aged between 2 and 69 years who were free from conditions that could potentially limit joint mobility for the study. Nine licensed physical therapists used universal goniometers to determine passive joint motion bilaterally of elbow flexion, extension, supination and pronation, shoulder flexion, hip flexion and extension, knee flexion and extension, and ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion. Descriptive statistics were calculated for male and female subjects in four age groups: 2-8, 9-19, 20-44 and 45-69 years. Joint ROM measurements were obtained on a total of 674 (53.6% female) healthy, normal subjects aged 2-69 years. Female subjects had greater joint mobility in all age groups in nearly all joints and the gender difference was most obvious in measures of ankle plantarflexion, elbow pronation and supination. Range of motion average values for all joints decreased with advancing age for both men and women and, in most cases, were significantly different than most commonly used normative values. Our study of ROM measurements taken by trained physical therapists on a large sample of healthy individuals revealed significant gender- and age-related variation that may be an important consideration in patient assessment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Soucie et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a21176d01cd1e967e1e456ahttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2516.2010.02399.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The effect of talocrural joint manipulation on range of motion at the ankle2002 · 61 citations
  2. 2Normal range of motion of joints in male subjects.1979 · 678 citations
  3. 3The Timing of Normal Puberty and the Age Limits of Sexual Precocity: Variations around the World, Secular Trends, and Changes after Migration2003 · 1,795 citations
  4. 4Body mass index in children and adolescents according to age and pubertal stage2000 · 87 citations
  5. 5The effects of gender and pubertal status on generalized joint laxity in young athletes2007 · 221 citations