PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026American Journal of Agricultural Economics0 citations

Consequences of land retirement policies on agricultural labor and land tenure: Evidence from the historical Conservation Reserve Program in the United States

View Full Paper
AHAparna HowladerLLLiqing Li

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore the economic impacts of the Conservation Reserve Program on agricultural labor and land tenure.
  • Analyzed data from the Conservation Reserve Program enrollment database linked to agricultural census data (1950s-1970s).
  • Examined declines in tenant-cultivated land across counties with varying enrollment intensities.
  • Focused on both short- and long-term impacts of land retirement policies.
  • In medium-enrollment counties, tenant-operated land declined by approximately 0.6 percentage points.
  • High-enrollment counties experienced a decline of about 1.6 percentage points in tenant-cultivated land.
  • The proportion of tenant farm operators decreased significantly in medium and high-enrollment counties, particularly in the South.

Abstract

Abstract Voluntary agricultural land retirement programs are widely recognized for their environmental benefits, yet their economic effects, particularly on labor markets and land tenure, remain less understood. This paper examines the short‐ and long‐term impacts of the first large‐scale US land retirement initiative, the historical Conservation Reserve Program, introduced under the 1956 Set‐Aside Act. Between 1957 and 1960, the program enrolled more than 30 million acres under 3‐, 5‐, or 10‐year contracts, which then expired gradually through 1970. Using a newly digitized Conservation Reserve Program enrollment database linked to agricultural census data from the 1950s through the 1970s, we find that counties with medium and high enrollment intensity experienced statistically significant declines in tenant‐cultivated land relative to low‐enrollment counties during the program's active years. In medium‐enrollment counties, tenant‐operated land declined by roughly 0.6 percentage points, while high‐enrollment counties experienced declines of approximately 1.6 percentage points nationally. The proportion of tenant farm operators also fell in both medium‐ and high‐enrollment counties. These effects were larger and more persistent in the South, especially in counties with higher shares of nonwhite farm operators and sharecropping.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Howlader et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a211780d499ed480b170488https://doi.org/10.1002/ajae.70082
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper