PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026Geophysical Research Letters0 citationsOpen Access

Complex Shallow Unilateral Rupture of the 2025 M w 7.0 Hubbard Glacier Earthquake Terminated by a Restraining Bend on the Connector Fault

View Full Paper
MJMohammadreza JamalreyhaniFNFenglin NiuSCSimone Cesca

Key Points

  • This research examines the intricate rupture behavior of the Hubbard Glacier earthquake, focusing on its mechanics and geological implications.
  • Utilized hypocenter relocations to analyze earthquake epicenters.
  • Employed moment tensor inversions for assessing seismic data from mainshock and aftershocks.
  • Conducted finite-fault modeling to simulate rupture behavior and mechanics.
  • The mainshock exhibited complex right-lateral strike-slip rupture with a northwestward propagation.
  • Source inversion detailed shallow oblique-slip on a fault striking 303° and dipping 63° NE.
  • Aftershock data delineated a 60 km seismic zone marked by predominant strike-slip mechanisms.

Abstract

Abstract Despite decades of study, the detailed geometry of the Connector fault at the Alaska–Canada border remains poorly constrained. We investigate the rupture complexity and directivity of the 6 December 2025, M w 7.0 Hubbard Glacier earthquake using hypocenter relocations, moment tensor inversions of the mainshock and aftershocks, and finite‐fault modeling. We model seismological data using bootstrap and Bayesian‐based probabilistic inversion. Observations indicate that the mainshock rupture was complex, nucleated with a right‐lateral strike‐slip mechanism and propagating northwestward, ultimately terminating in a restraining bend. Source inversion of the mainshock reveals shallow right‐lateral oblique‐slip on a fault striking 303° and dipping 63° NE. Relocated aftershocks delineate an ∼60 km‐long seismic zone characterized by strike‐slip mechanisms along the ruptured area and reverse/thrust at the left stepover of the fault. Our results provide a detailed mechanism for a buried Connector structure and highlight the role of fault bends in controlling rupture evolution.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jamalreyhani et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2117bfd499ed480b17098fhttps://doi.org/10.1029/2026gl122036
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Grond - A probabilistic earthquake source inversion framework2018 · 130 citations
  2. 2Pyrocko - An open-source seismology toolbox and library2011 · 220 citations
  3. 3New constraints on the motion of the Fairweather fault, Alaska, from GPS observations2003 · 96 citations
  4. 4NLL-SSST-coherence high-precision earthquake location catalog for the M 7.0, 2025 Alaska-Yukon Hubbard Glacier earthquake sequence2025 · 1 citations
  5. 5Uncertainties in Finite-Fault Slip Inversions: To What Extent to Believe? (A Critical Review)2003 · 173 citations