PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026Journal of Plant Ecology0 citationsOpen Access

Digital ecology reveals spatially heterogeneous threshold responses of ecological security in mountainous regions of Southwest China

View Full Paper
SHSuling HeYWYì WángLLLu Liu

Key Points

  • This study aims to assess spatiotemporal changes in ecological security and identify nonlinear threshold responses across different ecological zones.
  • Developed a data-driven framework combining ecological models, machine learning, and remote sensing data.
  • Assessed ecological security changes from 2000 to 2020 in Central Yunnan, China.
  • Analyzed drivers affecting ecological security using SHAP-based analysis.
  • Ecological security index increased from 0.3533 in 2000 to 0.3798 in 2020, with 71.56% of the area showing improvement.
  • Zone 1 exhibited the largest increase in ESI (0.0681), while Zone 8 showed the smallest increase (0.0138).
  • Slope was identified as the most influential driver, with notable nonlinear thresholds concentrated within 13°–15%.

Abstract

Abstract Ecological security exhibits pronounced nonlinear responses and spatial heterogeneity to natural conditions and human activities, yet the spatial differentiation of these nonlinear thresholds across contrasting ecological contexts remains poorly understood. Focusing on Central Yunnan, China, this study developed a data-driven framework integrating the Driver–Pressure–State–Ecosystem services–Response framework with explainable machine learning and multi-source remote sensing data to assess spatiotemporal changes in ecological security from 2000 to 2020 and identify the nonlinear threshold responses of key drivers across ecological zones. The results showed that the regional mean ecological security index (ESI) increased from 0.3533 in 2000 to 0.3798 in 2020, indicating an overall fluctuating upward trend. Areas with improved ecological security accounted for 71.56% of the study area, whereas 28.44% showed decline, with degraded areas mainly concentrated in impervious surfaces their surrounding regions. Ecological security displayed marked spatial differentiation, with relatively high ESI values in Zones 1, 3 and 5, whereas Zone 2 remained persistently low. The magnitude of improvement also varies significantly among different ecological zones, with Zone 1 showing the largest increase (0.0681) and Zone 8 the smallest (0.0138). Among the examined drivers, slope consistently emerged as the most stable and influential factor at the regional scale, followed by precipitation and elevation. SHAP-based analysis further revealed a pronounced nonlinear threshold effect of slope on ecological security, with global thresholds persistently concentrated within 13°–15°, yet showing clear spatial heterogeneity among ecological zones. These findings provide new insight into ecological security formation mechanisms and support differentiated ecological governance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

He et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2117bfd499ed480b170995https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtag130
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper