PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026TSQ Transgender Studies Quarterly0 citations

Have You Seen the Monster?

View Full Paper
BHBret Hairston

Key Points

  • This essay explores a Black trans interpretation of Nalo Hopkinson's work to examine nonhuman identity and gender flexibility.
  • Analyzes Hopkinson's 'Greedy Choke Puppy' through a Black trans lens.
  • Engages with theories from Hortense Spillers, C. Riley Snorton, and Zakiyyah Iman Jackson.
  • Discusses how nonhuman forms represent gender transitions.
  • Argues that Hopkinson's work challenges the traditional notion of humanity.
  • Highlights the potential for gender fungibility to emerge from nonhuman transformation.
  • Illustrates the idea of fugitivity as a rejection of rigid identity categories.

Abstract

Abstract Speculative works by writers such as Nalo Hopkinson are rife with attempts to think beyond the category of human through the use of mythical world building. This essay aims to introduce a Black trans reading of Hopkinson's “Greedy Choke Puppy” to analyze the ways that this writer creates a speculation of beingness beyond the project of the “human.” Turning to theorists such as Hortense Spillers, C. Riley Snorton, Zakiyyah Iman Jackson, and other key interlocutors, what unfolds is a rumination on how bodily transformation into nonhuman forms makes legible the possibility of gender fungibility as fugitivity from the treacherous category of “human.”

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bret Hairston (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2117fdd499ed480b170c43https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-11521542
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper