PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026Sustainability0 citationsOpen Access

Automation and Robotization for Enhancing Occupational Safety, Ergonomics, and Social Sustainability in Plastic Crate Production Processes

View Full Paper
RPRoksana PawełczykPKPatrycja KabieszGPGrażyna Płaza

Key Points

  • This study evaluates how automation scenarios influence occupational safety and ergonomics in plastic crate production.
  • Developed an integrated analytical framework for ergonomic assessment and process simulation.
  • Applied discrete-event simulation model in DBR77 to analyze workstation configurations.
  • Used Ishikawa analysis, RULA, and REBA methods for ergonomic risk evaluation.
  • AGV-supported configuration had the shortest cycle time of 1270 s per batch of 30 units.
  • Robot-assisted variant had the longest cycle time of 1520 s.
  • RULA scores decreased from 6–7 to 3–4, and REBA scores decreased from 8–10 to 4–5 in automated scenarios.

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of selected automation scenarios on occupational safety, ergonomics, and operational performance in a plastic crate production workstation. The research focuses on a specific case from the discrete manufacturing sector and aims to develop an integrated analytical framework combining ergonomic assessment with process simulation for the evaluation of organizational and technological improvements in manual handling operations. This study applies a simulation-based production model developed in the DBR77 discrete-event simulation environment to analyze alternative workstation configurations. The assessment framework integrates Ishikawa analysis for root-cause identification and the RULA and REBA methods for ergonomic risk evaluation. The investigated workstation was characterized by repetitive manual handling activities, awkward working postures, and increased physical workload associated with palletizing and transport operations. Several organizational and technological variants were analyzed, including additional operator support, robot-assisted palletizing, conveyor integration, and automated guided vehicle (AGV) transport. The simulation results indicated that the AGV-supported configuration achieved the shortest cycle time (1270 s per batch of 30 units), whereas the robot-assisted variant resulted in the longest cycle time (1520 s). Ergonomic assessment showed a reduction in RULA scores from 6–7 to 3–4 and REBA scores from 8–10 to 4–5 in the automated scenarios. The contribution of this study lies in the integration of ergonomic risk assessment and discrete-event simulation within a unified evaluation framework for workstation redesign in discrete manufacturing environments. The findings demonstrate how simulation-supported analysis can support decision-making regarding the balance between manual labor and automation under specific operational conditions. Due to the single-case-study design, the results should be interpreted as context-specific and exploratory rather than directly generalizable to all manufacturing systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pawełczyk et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2117fdd499ed480b170cfdhttps://doi.org/10.3390/su18115470
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Safety Culture in SMEs of the Food Industry: A Case Study and Best Practices2024 · 12 citations
  2. 2The Impact of Ergonomic Rationalisation on the Efficiency and Productivity of the Production Process2025 · 2 citations
  3. 3Digital twins-based smart manufacturing system design in Industry 4.0: A review2021 · 758 citations
  4. 4Opportunities of the Technological Trends Linked to Industry 4.0 for Achieve Sustainable Manufacturing Objectives2022 · 36 citations
  5. 5Ergonomics and design for safety: A scoping review and bibliometric analysis in the industrial engineering literature2025 · 13 citations