PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026Earth Surface Processes and Landforms0 citations

Wave modulation of flood‐driven jet dynamics, suspended‐sediment dispersion and event‐scale morphodynamics in the Modaomen Estuary

View Full Paper
JLJing LiuFYFang YangBLBo Li

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how waves influence flood-driven jet dynamics and sediment distribution in the Modaomen Estuary.
  • Developed a two-dimensional coupled wave-current-sediment model using TELEMAC-MASCARET.
  • Analyzed the effects of flood magnitude and tidal phase on jet and sediment dispersion dynamics.
  • Measured changes in morphological patterns due to wave interactions.
  • Waves constrain the seaward spreading and intensity of the flood-driven jet while inducing a northeastward deflection.
  • Produced a more concentrated sediment distribution within the jet zone, with enhanced landward transport as flood magnitude increased.
  • Led to greater mean siltation thickness and increased erosional patterns on the southwestern flank.

Abstract

Abstract As a river–wave‐dominated estuary, the morphological evolution of the Modaomen Estuary is jointly controlled by river discharge and wave forcing. Using measured bathymetry, we developed a two‐dimensional coupled wave–current–sediment model within the TELEMAC‐MASCARET system to quantify how waves, under floods of different magnitudes, modulate the flood‐driven jet, suspended‐sediment dispersion and event‐scale morphodynamics. The results show that (1) waves do not change the fundamental jet structure, but constrain its seaward spreading and systematically reduce its spatial extent and intensity; the modulation depends on tidal phase (flood/ebb) and flood magnitude, and waves also induce a northeastward deflection of the jet. (2) Waves limit offshore sediment export, producing a more concentrated and spatially uniform sediment distribution within the jet zone, with suppressed southwestward diffusion and enhanced northeastward (landward) transport; this directional redistribution strengthens with increasing flood magnitude. (3) Although the wave‐driven redistribution does not fundamentally alter the overall erosion–deposition pattern among flood scenarios, it causes two persistent modifications: greater mean siltation thickness within the zone of established flow, with enhanced accumulation near the termini of the eastern and western channels, and a stronger erosional tendency on the southwestern flank, accompanied by increased deposition on the northeastern flank.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a211852d499ed480b170f09https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.70324
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Effects of High River Discharges on the Morphodynamics of the Guadiana ebb-tidal delta2020 · 5 citations
  2. 2Flow Patterns and Morphological Changes in a Sandy Meander Bend during a Flood—Spatially and Temporally Intensive ADCP Measurement Approach2017 · 72 citations
  3. 3Circulation patterns and implication for fine sediment transport in a preserved tropical estuary: The case of the Maroni (French Guiana)2020 · 8 citations
  4. 4Global-scale human impact on delta morphology has led to net land area gain2020 · 465 citations
  5. 5Mississippi River Mouth Processes: Effluent Dynamics and Morphologic Development1974 · 188 citations