PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 2011231 citationsOpen Access

A Low-Power CoAP for Contiki

View Full Paper
MKMatthias KovatschSDSimon DuquennoyADAdam Dunkels

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Internet of Things devices will by and large be battery-operated, but existing application protocols have typically not been designed with power-efficiency in mind. In low-power wireless systems, power-efficiency is determined by the ability to maintain a low radio duty cycle: keeping the radio off as much as possible. We present an implementation of the IETF Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) for the Contiki operating system that leverages the ContikiMAC low-power duty cycling mechanism to provide power efficiency. We experimentally evaluate our low-power CoAP, demonstrating that an existing application layer protocol can be made power-efficient through a generic radio duty cycling mechanism. To the best of our knowledge, our CoAP implementation is the first to provide power-efficient operation through radio duty cycling. Our results question the need for specialized low-power mechanisms at the application layer, instead providing low-power operation only at the radio duty cycling layer.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kovatsch et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2125ee570f73dd9ac3c3d0https://doi.org/10.1109/mass.2011.100
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1IP is dead, long live IP for wireless sensor networks2008 · 311 citations
  2. 2The Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)2014 · 2,523 citations
  3. 3Principled design of the modern Web architecture2002 · 1,691 citations
  4. 4The Announcement Layer: Beacon Coordination for the Sensornet Stack2011 · 52 citations
  5. 5Integrating Wireless Sensor Networks with the Web2011 · 89 citations